Showing posts sorted by relevance for query revenants. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query revenants. Sort by date Show all posts

Wednesday, 30 November 2022

Les Revenants: considering genre

Starting with the conclusion: Les Revenants is atypical

In this absolutely bizarre scene, Claire is absolutely terrified by her long dead daughter Camille seemingly returning from the grave. However, Camille to have no idea what has happened. This engrossing scene captures the appeal of Les Revenants, an arguably fascinating show that expertly blends expectations of genre with a highly confusing and involving family drama


By now you will have watched the first episode of the French TV thriller/horror/zombie/drama/tragic romance/surreal/whatever show Les Revenants (AKA The Returned). Les Revs is very very different from the other TV show we have studied (which is either Humans if you are taking the exam in 2023 or Black Mirror if you are taking the exam in 2024 and beyond. In fact, we can take a second right now to present a specific and straightforward argument that you will use in the final exam:

Les Revenants is highly atypical

or

Les Revenants is particularly subversive

or

Les Revenants is extremely unconventional

So if you found Les Revenants difficult, impenetrable, weird, confusing, subversive or just plain odd, then good! Your argument will be that this show clearly does things different. How and why are the questions we need to answer here.

Les Revenants is extremely unconventional in terms of generic conventions 

Most of the things we have looked at so far, with the exception of Adbusters have been extremely conventional in terms of genre. However, it is clear the Les Revenants is very unconventional in terms of genre. It doesn't really fit clearly in to one genre. 

Task 1: generic conventions

Below are a number of genres and subgenres that Les Revs could fit in to. This is all highly debatable. For each of these, make a list of conventional elements and unconventional elements. These should all be related to the textual analysis toolkit, for example shot types, camera angles and so on. Please use the episode itself as guidance for this task.

Genre: Horror

Subgenres: psychological horror, zombie, supernatural horror, folk horror

Genre: Drama

Subgenres: thriller, psychological thriller, soap opera, romantic tragedy, paranormal romance

Examples:

Psychological horror: themes of madness and confusion are encoded through the use of long takes, and through the isolated and nightmarish setting. Further examples include...

Psychological thriller: The use of over the top performances, particularly in the scene when Lena is reunited with Camille emphasise the intense psychological trauma experienced by the main characters. This is further anchored through...

Les Revenant is extremely unconventional in terms of narrative

Task 2 - what narrative techniques does Les Revenants utilise

Consider the following narrative techniques, and explain to what extent Les Revenants uses these elements. Remember to check the glossary (or just google) if there's anything you need a refresher on!

  • Todorovian equilibrium
  • Multi-strand/flexi-narratives
  • Character arcs

Les Revenants is unconventional with it's cinematography

Let's tie together the elements of cinematography and narrative with editing. 

Task 3 - watch the scene where Camille comes home

This is the scene where Camille returns to the Seurat family household and meets with her mum. A very alienating, confusing, and potentially satisfying scene is played out, making full use of a variety of different elements of media language. But what does it mean? Why is Claire freaking out? Why is Camille so chilled? And how can we make sense of this scene?

Task 4 - watch this video 

And make notes on how the 'Camille comes home' scene creates meaning for the target audience.... whoever that may be! 

Tuesday, 11 December 2018

Les Revenants mini mock - example responses



You can find below a rage of responses for a potential question that could come up in Component two section B: TV in a global age. This is an audience question, and for Les Revenants, the only audience theory we need to explore in depth in Stuart Hall's notion of audience reception and negotiation. If you want to find out what theories you need to know for each industry, make sure you check out the revision guide!

All responses were completed in half an hour by teachers or students, and are presented unedited, with only minor corrections. Please note that these should be seen officially as examples rather than exemplars. This includes the teacher responses! In some cases, the wrong names of theorists are used, theoretical terms are used incorrectly, or paragraph structure may be imprecise. However, it is important to note that exam responses are seldom 'perfect', and are written under stressful conditions. If you spot a mistake, congratulate yourself, and consider how you can avoid doing something similar!

"It is essential for a TV programme to simultaneously target both mass and specialised audiences"
Explore this statement with reference to Les Revenants


Michael's response 1


Mass audience refers to the vast and undefined audience typical to the early days of telecommunications. Initially, with only a handful of TV channels, audiences were forced to all partake in the same experiences, and as such, responses were potentially limited. However, thanks to a range of digital technologies and widening audience tastes, there has been a gravitation from traditional methods of broadcasting, to more modern methods of narrowcasting. Increasingly, producers have discovered the advantages of targeting cult, or devoted audiences. For Les Revenants, a French language supernatural/horror/zombie TV that subverts many generic paradigms, it is absolutely essential that targets a cult audience. Les Revenants expertly targets both 'casual' and 'devoted' audiences, by providing the audience with a range of polysemic readings. However, it’s ability to target a mass audience is fundamentally limited by its own insistence on using hermeneutic codes to explore it’s narrative. Les Revenants was first broadcast on the French premium TV channel Canal +, before being distributed by UK channel Chanel 4 a year later. In both instances, the show was broadcast on a weeknight at 9pm, suggesting a moderate potential for mass audience appeal.

A typical example of how Les Revenants primarily targets a cult or specialised audience is through the scene where Camille Seurat is reunited with her mother. Camille, unknown to herself and even to the audience has been dead for four years. Her entrance in to the house is marked by a generically typical diegetic ‘crash’ noise, and a typically horror film response from her mother: one of cold fear. This is anchored through a series of close up shots of her terrified face, and a slow paced exploratory montage of tracking shots of her descending the stairs. It is at this stage that the audience’s expectations of a conventional horror film are confounded. Camille nonchalantly stands in the family kitchen (stereotypically middle class, and stereotypically minimalist French chic) and informs her mother in a rapid-fire delivery of her awful day. Audiences, both specialised and potentially mainstream are forced at this point to negotiate this scene in a variety of ways. Camille’s mother, shot in low-key lighting forms a binary opposition to Camille in many ways. Her frantic, terrified facial expressions contrast with Camille’s. This is clearly not a typical horror film narrative. Audiences, especially specialised, cult audiences, may well take pleasure in the subversion of horror film conventions. Mogwai’s non-diegetic soundtrack anchors the audience’s response that this is indeed a stereotypical, conventional horror text, yet Camille is non-threatening, and lacks a range of generic paradigmatic features of the zombie genre, in that she is conventionally attractive and lacks rotting flesh or dead, vacant eyes. In this sense, Les Revenants primarily targets a specialised audience rather than a mainstream, mass audience.

Stuart Hall argues that audiences are forced in to a negotiation with the producer, and must choose whether to except or reject the preferred ideological reading. However, it is highly likely that Fabrice Gobert, the director of Les Revenants intentionally rejected the programme having one solid, preferred reading. In this sense, it can be seen that Les Revenants is highly polysemic.

A typical example of this polysemy can be found at the end of the first episode. An intertitle announces to the audience ‘four years earlier’ which instantly presents a powerful hermeneutic code. Our initial assumption that Camille was only recently dead is pleasurably subverted for both the cult target audience and the more mainstream secondary audience. However, the ending only goes on to establish more hermeneutic codes. Cross cutting between identical siblings, the 15-year-old Lena losing her virginity, and the 15-year-old Camille’s symbolic horror at her sister’s innocence being lost, a deliberately confrontational scene that divides the audience. From a British perspective, the sex scene involving two 15 year olds (despite the actor’s being 18) is taboo. Additionally, the increasingly rapid-fire cross cutting between Lena’s orgasm and Celine’s death, both illustrated through a montage of confrontational close up shots, is challenging for the audience. The final shot, a first-person bird’s eye view shot of Camille dying through impact with the ground is not a typical cliff-hanger, especially as it recalls the first shot of the first episode. The ideological perspective of the producer can be explored here, and audiences are once more forced to negotiate a difficult and challenging binary opposition between sex and death. This allegorical theme is typical of many French texts, as far ranged as Bataille’s The Story of the Eye, the popular lesbian drama Blue is the Warmest Colour, to Bunuel’s L’age d’or. However, to international audiences, a potentially oppositional response is provoked.

We have seen that Les Revenants uses a range of polysemic readings to target specialised cult audiences. This is further reinforced through the use of merchandise and viral marketing opportunities, such as Mogwai’s soundtrack CD/LP, the film tie-in book, the ‘Lake Pub’ T shirt, allowing audiences the pleasure at making reference to a hyperreal location, and the TV programme’s own enigmatic website. However, there are examples of how Les Revenants targets a wider, more mainstream secondary ‘casual audience’. This is primarily achieved through the use of intertextuality. An excellent example of this is through the character of Julie. In her late 20’s and lacking stereotypical sexualisation, Julie entertains herself through watching Tobe Hopper’s 1970’s film The Texas Chainsaw Massacre. The montage that follows is pure horror film convention. Julie is stalked by Victor, an archetypal ‘creepy child’. His status as antagonist is emphasised and further anchored through the drab mise en scene and Mogwai’s omnipresent diegetic soundtrack. As Julie looks out of her flat window, an extreme long shot demonstrates Victor’s outsider status and potentially vulnerability. These intertextual references allow the audience to take pleasure in horror film conventions, and for mass audiences to understand the product.

Ultimately, Les Revenants targets a niche, non-mainstream audience. However, it is still essential that the show has some mass audience appeal. This is primarily achieved through the utilisation of hermeneutic codes and polysemy for the cult target audience, and the frequent use of intertextuality for more mainstream mass audiences.

Michael's response 2


For most TV programmes and their producers, it is essential to strike a balance between targeting mass and specialised audiences. Mass audience simply refers to the vast and generic audience first described in the UK in relation to the early days of telecommunications broadcast. With only one channel available, the ratings share of each programme would naturally be 100%, and therefore each programme needed to have ‘mass appeal’. Lord Leith, then commissioner general for the BBC had grave doubts about this system, considering a mass communications platform an insidious way of ‘dumbing down’ the populace. However, this concept of mass audience has increasingly become less and less prevalent. Now, audiences are far more likely to be niche, and TV programmes are far more likely to narrowcast as opposed to broadcast. This allows smaller ‘cult audiences to be targeted. Les Revenants, a 2012 French supernatural horror hybrid programme, is a clear example of a show with little mass audience appeal, that instead targets a cult audience. I shall explore this notion with reference to key scenes, promotional material, and reference to the very particular and cult nature of the soundtrack.

On first glance, Les Revenants may seem like it has potential for mass appeal. For example, there are a diverse range of attractive characters of different ages, in a stunning and compelling setting. However, in practice, these elements prove to be subversive. An excellent example of Les Revenants purely targeting a cult audience is the scene where Lena Seurat, a 19-year-old barmaid, walks home Simon, an attractive and yet undead young man. Taking place in the dark and gloomy mise-en-scene of the small town. The two characters walk together in a two-shot tracking shot. From a stereotypical narrative perspective, Lena and Simon would be the ideal couple. Simon’s leather jacket and miserable personality demonstrates his misanthropic ideology, which would be a perfect match for Lena’s teen girl archetype. However, the potential romance is subverted through Simon’s deliberately obnoxious character. His performance is muted, and focused purely on his actual love, the now significantly older Adele. In a telling close up shot, Lena shouts at Simon, calling him a ‘dickhead’. This scene provides the target cult audience many opportunities to negotiate a response. Doubtless many audiences will be frustrated with Lena and Simon’s relationship, as they are denied the voyeuristic pleasure of seeing the two characters fall in love. However, other audiences may enjoy the exciting subversion of the conventions of the horror genre, as the undead Simon is atypically attractive, and shows no stereotypically inclination to murder Lena and eat her brans. In this way, we see the scene offer the audience a range of polysemic interpretations, further cementing its appeal as a cult, specialised Programme.

It’s nature as a specialised TV show can be traced back to the mode of its production. Produced for Canal +, a premium French cable channel that prides itself on prestigious, high quality productions that may not receive mass audience appeal, the show itself is a remake of an earlier supernatural film of the same name. Rather than try to soften the edges of the show, the director, Fabrice Gobert instead sought to maximise the programme’s cult appeal through employing the cult Glaswegian noise rock band Mogwai to compose and produce the show’s not diegetic soundtrack. This move is highly atypical, eschewing the orchestral soundtrack that similar TV horror shows such as The Walking Dead or Being Human have. An excellent example of how this atypically manifests itself is the scene where Victor stalks Julie back home to her flat. Hardly a stereotypical horror location, Julie instead lives in a brutalist and grey block of social housing flats. This forms a definite binary opposition between her and the middle-class Seurat family. Julie is also not hegemonically stereotypically beautiful, with her thick glasses and unflattering jumper, making her highly atypical for a horror text ‘victim’ Likewise Victor, himself a binary opposition to the fragile and troubled Julie, is a young boy. The unfamiliarity of the locations to the genre is anchored through Mogwai’s highly atypical soundtrack, which focuses on a range of atonal and un-melodic elements, including guitar clangs and subdued keyboard stabs. Mogwai’s presence offer the producers of Les Revenants a pre-existing cult audience, in that pre-existing fans of Mogwai may seek out the show due to their involvement. It also provides Les Revenants with a definite outsider status. Mogwai have no frontman, have released precisely one single, 2000’s My Father My King, a 20-minute-long instrumental jam that covers a Hebrew prayer, and is an uncommercial as they come. In fact, it is hard to ignore the notion that Les Revenants is actually being as deliberately uncommercial as possible in order to ensure a specialised audience.

This uncommercial approach of course leads to problems when it comes to distribute and market the show. Though the program offers no preferred reading, rendering Stuart Hall’s reception theory absolutely useless, it still needs to make money in order for Canal + to actually finance it. Further funding came from a variety of sources, including the French alps tourist board, offering almost 1million euros as an opportunity to promote the product. However, the ultimate example of how specialised Les Revenant’s appeal is through it’s extremely TYPICAL trailer. The international trailer for Les Revenants completely changes the tone of the show, offering audiences a fast paced montage of the whole of the eight episodes, exploring the themes of the show including supernatural romance, grief, death, love and sex. While the show drip feeds it’s cult audiences through elaborate and mysterious character arcs and an insistence on using hermeneutic codes, the trailer actually reveals a variety of mysteries from the off. It even resembles a stereotypical zombie narrative, primarily through the frequent use of Long shots of ‘the horde’ of zombies, primarily taken from the show’s eighth episode! The exciting mise en scene, rapid fire editing and cross cutting, and the selection of only the most exciting scenes serves to underline exactly how atypical the show actually is. It suggests that if an honest approach to reflecting the themes of the show was taken, it would lack an audience.

Finally, the shows insistence on covering themes of grief is omnipresent in Les Revenants. The subdued opening shot of Camille’s bus careering off a cliff face in a static, unflinching longshot forms a direct binary opposition to the severity of the incident. Audiences are instantly left without a way of negotiating the scene, and are force to accept from the initial enigmatic shot that the show not only lacks a preferred reading, but also seeks to polarise its audience through deliberately upsetting imagery.

To conclude, Les Revenants solely targets a cult audience. Though some promotional material may hint at mass appeal, the show itself uses enigmatic hermeneutic codes, confounds audience expectations, makes reference to already cult bands and features upsetting themes of grief and desperation. Therefore it……………………………………….

I didn't finish in time :( 

Student 1


Les Revenants subverts this statement by only targeting a specialised cult audience through polysemic readings in relation to Stuart Hall's Reception Theory. However, Les Revenants subverts a lot of his readings as well. Les Revenant was first aired in 2012 on Canal+ in France, and was broadcasted to channel 4 a year late (in 2013) for the UK. All music is composed by a Glaswegian band called Mogwai (post-rock genre).

On the one hand, Les Revenants has a Horror, Cult genre meaning it has a very specialised audience who most likely watch horror movies and a lot are devoted fans to the show. The show targets this specialised audiences with use of intertextuality of other horror genres - Stuart Halls Reception theory. For example, in the scene of Julie watching a movie the room has a low key lighting whilst Julie has confined herself on the sofa creating a spooky lexis to the scene, this suggests she is watching horror genre. The mise-en-scene of chainsaw sound effects and flashing lighting from the tv in the background of the movie is intertextual and directly references the horror movie 'Chainsaw Massacre'.
Les Revenants specialised audience would likely understand the intertextuality due to there love of horror genre, this could possibly be a preferred reading that Les Revenants wants its audience to understand. However, another preferred reading could be that the show wants its audience to be frustrated by not knowing what the film is, meaning that Les Revenants actually subverts polysemic readings by having an unknown preferred reading; this effect is conveyed though the use of a mid-shot from an angles where the tv screen cannot be clearly seen so that the audience can only understand the reference by mise-en-scene of sound.

On the other hand, Les Revenants does not have a mass audience as the movie is fairly slow paced and requires a lot of interest to understand how it subverts stereotypical horror-zombie sub-genre conventions. For example, the show only uses indirect mise-en-scene to convey connotations of death like constant low-key lighting. In the scene where Simon goes to see Adele, Simon is wearing a black suit whilst Adele is wearing a white dress, this creates a binary opposition that symbolises life and death (as Simon has come from the dead) - in which a casual audience may not understand into depth unlike it's cult audience.

However, Les Revenants has an international audience from English/Scottish areas. The band Mogwai has their own cult audience around England and Scotland, these audience have been linked to Les Revenants due to there synergy and how the band music reflects the slow and deep themes of the show. Because of this, Les Revenants has a much larger specialised audience that are mostly not in France and have a whole other cult audience through Mogwai.

In conclusion, Les Revenants highly subverts the statement due to its vast amounts of intertextuality and many referential codes (Stuart Hall) that only cult audience and horror fans would understand to the full extent of its detail within the show. The lack of polysemic readings in the show also makes it harder for casual audiences to watch, as they have to produce their own ideologies to the show creating a confusing plot and slow pace to understanding the show.

Student 2


I agree it is essential for a TV programme to simultaneously target both mass and specialised audiences. The term 'Mass Audience' came from the mass broadcasting on television in the early days of its creation. With only a few available television channels, the content had to appeal to a wide range of people and include different ways for this wide range of people to connect with the content. Now that narrow broadcasting is a thing of the past with more TV channels, online streaming services (e.g. Netflix) and piracy existing, there has been space for more specialised audience shows to be made. These are often referred to as 'cult' shows with an intense following behind it and fans who engage with the show in more ways than just watching it, for example, fan-fictions, fan art, 'shipping' pairs of characters together (imagining them in relationships), creating extensive Wikipedia pages, and more.

It is often beneficial for shows to establish a cult audience as it means they have a group of people who will always come back for more and engage heavily with the product being created with more incentive to support it, but it also means that this audience may be small, meaning less people watch the show. This is a good reason to combine appealing to mass audiences and specialised audiences. You will be able to get lots of people watching as well as having a group who go the extra mile to engage with it. Canal+ is the producer and distributor of Les Revenants. They have an ideology similar to that of the UK 'Channel 4' where they want to be subversive and play a variety of different shows challenging the norm of TV. This is the reason Canal+ decided to take on Les Revenants, its ability to break paradigms and create mystery.

Les Revenants is a subversive, polysemic show because it falls into a range of different genres. It could be described as a Supernatural Zombie French Drama show and that probably wouldn't even cover the litany of sub-genres it also falls into. There are many places which these genres can be scene interacting with each other and creating multiple readings for the audience to discover.

In the scene where Camille's mother first sees her there are many conflicting representations we can see. Using Stuart Hall's reception theory we can figure out the different audience reactions to the scene and how this caters for both a cult and mass audience.

The scene starts with slow, droning non-diegetic soundtrack instantly creating a sinister atmosphere. This is immediately contrapuntal to the scene in which a mother is seeing her dead daughter and the preferred reading here is to create a feeling of tension in the audience by off-balancing them with this soundtrack. The shots of the scene show over the shoulder shot reverse shots of Camille and her mother in which the mother walks slowly towards her. This not only gives connotations of approaching a dangerous animal, but also adds to this contrapuntal reading of the scene by confusing the audience with this separation of mother and daughter. The mother is framed with low key lighting in which we can barely see her face. This effect was most likely done in post-production colour grading to create a paradigm of the horror genre. Camille is framed with high key lighting creating a binary opposition between them, the living and the dead.

In this scene the audience is given lots of different readings. The preferred is that Camille is dead and the mother is scared but a negotiated reading may be that the mother is going mad, or even that Camille is the evil antagonist through her anchorage with the music but juxtaposition with the high key lighting. It is almost made intentionally to confuse the audience and give them lots of ideas through Roland Barthes symbolic and hermeneutic codes. This intentional confusion of representations in this scene appeals to all of Les Revenants genres. Supernatural through use of lighting and sound, family drama through the conversation of a mother and her child, zombie through Camille coming back from the dead, and French through the setting (the alps) and lexis used.

While some audience members may be annoyed by this confusing representation, many will find something they are invested in.

One specific example of Les Revenants seeking a specialised audience is their use of the band MOGWAI to create their soundtrack, later released in album form 'Les Revenants'. MOGWAI is a 'Post-rock' band from Glasgow, Scotland. They have a slow, reflective and mood driven sound which is subversive of their genre.

Student 3


Although Les Revenants is a cult followed show mostly, in which they use such actions as using a subversive but also cult followed band Mogwai in order to target a more niche audience, the way in which the show encodes grief also demonstrates the way in which it is essential to also target mass audiences, that way combating any ideas of preferred reading. Stuart Hall's reception theory gave the idea that every product would have a preferred, oppositional and negotiated reading with every consumption of a media product. However, to target both cult and mass audience, Les Revenant deliberately doesn't follow this pattern to show the differences in readings of grief and the way in which people deal with it.

In one pivotal scene, there are a group of people at what we assume is a meeting, a place where in which people who have lost someone meet and discuss how they are or are not coping. The dark costume of all the characters reflects the atmosphere, accompanied by a low key lighting that made it clear that this was not a happy environment. the mise en scene shows us a bare room with only chairs and the people sat in them. However, when the father of Camille receives a phone call, there is a shot reverse shot of the mother telling him to come over, surprising the father as he leaves the bland and miserable setting of the room in order to foreshadow how he won't need that grief meeting as his child has returned.

This shows that although the show relies on a cult audience to understand the complexities of the zombie aspects as well as the other supernatural relationships, that the allegory of the zombies is of grief and how different people deals with it, something that a mass audience can relate to if only at a bare understanding of the concept. What this shows about the lack of preferred reading is that because everybody reacts to grief and the idea of the return of a loved one differently, there is not a possible idea of what a preferred reading would be as the fundamental theme reflects something that doesn't have a 'preferred' method or a natural way to react. For example, the mass audience may see a man who's struggling to deal with the death of his child and sympathise but also somebody may believe him to be a rude and selfish man who is reacting to other member's grief with spite. This lack of relation to Stuart Hall's theory shows that it subverts classical presentation of media and helps form a cult audience that can appreiocate the complexities of the show that a mass audience couldn't through ideologies.

In another key scene, when Camille's mother goes to the bathroom and Camille asks her for a towel, the disconnect between her and her daughter is not only symbolic but also presented through the shut door. The mother waits outside, and when Camille opens the door she reacts in shock as if she had just seen a zombie, which fundamentally she is. When she goes to get her a towel, the mother runs away in panic, but not in the conventional way but only to hide the grief she once had for her daughter. Instead of questioning it, she instead hides the memorial and the idea that her daughter has passed away. A mass audience may see a woman who is hiding her death and is trying to just accept her back and is struggling to react, however a more niche audience may believe that the use of the entrapment of the small hall way the mother stumbles towards symbolises the suffocation she feels as she's all alone with someone she hasn't seen in 4 years and the tracking shot not entering the room demonstrates that she has secluded this room to a memory that has now repaired.

Using the allegory that the zombies or 'the returned' is a true example of how people deal with grief differently and how the idea of family members coming back would affect the grief that remains there forever creates the idea that although targeting a niche audience is an essential element to present an intellectual reading but also creating an obvious display of human emotion, an emotion that every person experiences intrigues mass audiences that help subvert the classic perceptions of what preferred readings are.

Student 4


Targeting refers to how a media product attracts audiences to consume the media product. A mass audience is an audience that reaches a wide range of people, whereas a specialised audience is a audience targeted by the media production. This can be done though stereotypical paradigmatic features of the genre. I will argue that Les Revenants targets both mass and specialised audiences by deploying a range of polysemic readings. Les Revenants is a postmodern hyperreal supernatural drama television series, directed by Frabrice Gobert in France. It debuted on 26th November 2012 on Canal. It’s international distributer is Universal studios and debuted on 9 June 2013 on Channel 4. The soundtrack is produced by Mogwai, a "post rock" Scottish band, which was selected for their cult following and ideology, which breaks stereotypical paradigmatic features of a boy band. They produce contrapuntal music throughout the episode for polysemic audience responses.

The scene denoting Camille’s return presents polysemic readings for audiences, the low-key lighting and non-diegetic contrapuntal soundtrack is a paradigmatic feature of the horror genre. The shot reverse shot presents with the mise-en-scene presents a binary opposition of fear and calm with the facial expressions contrasted between the mother and Camille This presents several negotiated readings for the audience for instance, Liking the scene due to the suspect or disliking the scene due to how the mother is reacting to her daughter. This is useful for targeting mass and specialised audiences because of the hermeneutic codes it produces which can engage audiences in fandoms.

The scene between Simon, Lina and Adele also presents polysemic readings through the intertextual horror mise-en-scene. The close up of Adele looking into the mirror with Simon being blurry, due to the depth of field, and then disappearing. The intertextuality of Simon trying to break in with Adele crying. And the symbolism of their clothing referencing marriage and the binary opposition of life vs death portrayed by Simon being dead. The scene displays an enigma code for the audience to understand what has happened in their relationship which helps in creating negotiated readings for the audience to discuss. The fandom also might start “shipping” either Lina and Simon or Adele and Simon which can appeal to a cult audience.

Another scene is when Victor stalks Julie the low-key lighting and non-diegetic soundtrack creates an eerie setting, And the intertextuality of having a ghost child is suspenseful to the audience. A negotiated reading of this scene is that the audience hates it because it’s inconsistent as Julie surely must have seen Victor throughout the sequence. Another negotiated reading is that the scene is good due to the suspense created by the paradigmatic features of horror. As a whole one could question the effectiveness of Stuart Halls reception theory because the producer has not presented a clear ideology within Les Revenants and therefore takes out the possibility of having a preferred and oppositional reading.

In conclusion

Student 5


Les Revenants targets casual watchers and a cult audience through it's use of polysemic readings in relation to Stuart Hall's Reception Theory. However it can be argued that due to the many audience responses that Les Revenants may evoke, there are not many preferred readings which is subversive in terms of Les Revenants because the producer doesn't seem to have one specific ideology. This is why it is essential for media products to target mass audiences and specialised audiences because if one audience doesn't respond to the media product in a specific way others will. For example, Les Revenants was given a large sum of money to promote the French alps within the media but actually creates many oppositional readings to the producer's ideologies due to the nature of the show.

It is essential for both types of audiences to be targeted by media products because it allows different audiences to come up with different readings based on their prior knowledge or their own ideologies. An example of this is the non-diegetic sound in the shot that uses the 180 Degree rule  as a contrast between Camille's mum and Camille's feelings within the scene. The soundtrack may attract fans of the Glaswegian band 'Mogwai' which means that they may have a negotiated reading of the scene itself due to them being able to recognise the sound but feeling uneasy about Camille's sudden reappearance. This unease is also reinforced by the binary opposition of the mise-en-scene of lowkey lighting where Camille's mum is standing and the highkey lighting where Camille is standing. This may create a oppositional response by an audience as at this point in the episode, the audience is likely to be confused about the zombie sub-genre convention of coming back from the dead due to it being done in a subversive way.

Another reason it is essential for both types of audiences to be targeted within a media product is to get more people to watch it. This is evident with the intertextual reference to the Texas Chainsaw Massacre film which conforms to the stereotypical paradigmatic features of a horror film. This scene may appeal to an audience of horror fans due to the intertextual link to a horror film but may also appeal to a wider audience of families in general due to the mise-en-scene of the sofa in front of the TV. This may create a negotiated reading due to the audience being confused about the genre that is being established by this pilot episode but may also recognise the familiar sight of a sofa in front of a TV which is common in most family living rooms. The use of a high angle mid-shot for this scene may also create an oppositional reading due to the connotations of power that a high angle shot gives the audience viewing the product.

Overall, because Les Revenants seems to lack one specific producer ideology, it has many polysemic readings which are essential for a media product to appeal to a wide range of audiences. In relation to Stuart Hall's reception theory, many different audiences may react to different scenes in this pilot episode in different ways which creates many different audience responses due to the polysemic readings that can be identified within certain scenes. The lack of evident producer ideologies are what allows both cult and casual audiences to watch the show and enjoy it and due to the use of many different camera angles combined with mise-en-scene, it could create readings which may be negotiated online in on places like Reddit which could allow users to combine their own ideologies about the show to form their own identities which relates to David gauntlet's theories of identity which is essential for a producer to create a product that appeals to a specific audience. however in the case of Les Revenants, the producer has allowed the audience to create the ideology of the show which leaves no evident preferred reading for this show which makes it subversive.

Student 6


I agree that it is essential for a TV programme to simultaneously target both mass and specialised audiences. A specialised audience is someone who is a fan of the show. They are active and don't just watch the show and then get on with their lives. Specialised audiences create fan theories, talk about the show and buy merchandise. A mass audience is everyone else, the ones who watch the show and then carry on with their lives, they don't become obsessed with it like a cult/ specialised audience. Les Revenants is a thriller/supernatural French drama produced by Canal+ and broadcasted by channel 4 that targets both mass and specialised audiences by providing them with polysemic narratives.

One scene that has multiple meanings and responses is the reunion scene. Towards the beginning of the show Camille returns home and proceeds to make a sandwich, be gobby towards her mother and then leave the kitchen in a mess. Camille then goes upstairs for a shower and Claire follows her up the stairs. According to Stuart Hall every media product has three types of readings; preferred, negotiated and oppositional. A preferred reading is the reading the producer wanted the audience to have whilst and oppositional reading is when the audience completely disagrees with the producers ideologies. Many times audience members are somewhere in between these, this is a negotiated reading. I believe the preferred reading for this scene is confusion. A specialised audience are left feeling confused by the close ups of Claire's face as she goes up the stairs and the use of creepy non-diegetic sound. It creates confusion because we are unsure as to why she is reacting like this, she is scared and apprehensive of her own daughter. This makes the cult audience want to talk about it with other fans and post about it on social media and in online forums. I believe that the mass audience wont be confused by this scene but will feel sorry for Camille. Her mother is acting scared of her rather than going up and hugging her because she was presumed dead. This audience feels sorry for Camille but not enough for it to stay with them after the show has finished. Their emotions are not powerful enough to cause them to want to talk about it or post in forums. They are also not going to create fan theories over this scene whilst the specialised cult audience would.

Another way Les Revenants targets a specialised audience is through things outside the show. Online forums have been created for fans to talk about their ideas, concerns and confusion with others. Merchandise has been made of things from the show e.g a shirt that has the Lake pub on it. This allows audiences to show their love for the show, which may prompt conversations and even people deciding to watch the show after these conversations. However people who don't watch the show aren't likely to know of the Lake Pub and therefore a shirt with this on will make the cult audience feel part of something that is secret or like a club. Merchandise is a good way of the producers target cult because not only does it grown their audience it also allows them to get more revenue because they are selling things. Money is the primary goal of all media products.

A final way that Les Revenants targets a specialised audience is by conforming and subverting the horror and supernatural genre conventions. This is a zombie show, but from the first episode the mise-en-scene of makeup and costumes reveals nothing to the audience regarding who the zombies are. In most other zombie shows we can tell straight away who the zombies are because they look dead and stand out from the rest. However in Les Revenants both dead and alive look the same. This is going to provide the cult audience to create theories about who is dead, talk about it and become an active audience. When Camille is in the shower and the mother is walking up the stairs it makes use of non-diegetic music by Mogwai in order to make the audience feel apprehensive about what is going on and why the mother is so scared of her own daughter. This is a hermeneutic code because it creates suspense.

Les Revenants has allegorical aspects in the form of immigration. The dead have returned but are not welcomed very nicely and people are apprehensive and scared of them. This could be seen as relating to the people who are immigrating to our country, they are not welcomed at first by some and a vast amount of people are apprehensive about them being in this country. This could allow for a cult audience because it gives them something to relate to but also gives them yet another thing to talk about.

In conclusion I agree that TV programmes should target mass and specialised audiences simultaneously in order to ensure a big audience and to maximise profits. However I think that Les Revenants focuses more on targeting a mass audience because it is a supernatural TV show and fans want to talk about it and they get involved in it more than a show like Eastenders where viewers don't create theories, go to conventions or buy merchandise. It also provides the producers with more profit which is the primary goal for any media product.

Student 7


In the modern world, TV isn't just about sitting down in front of the screen, picking a channel and watching a show whenever it is scheduled. Due to streaming services and the internet, people are now much more able to pick and choose what they would like to watch and when they want to watch it. This makes it more essential than ever for TV shows to target such a large audience as they need to stand out from a much more diverse range than previously.

What is interesting about 'Les Revenants' is the outstanding genre hybridity it uses to create something that appeals to so many. The show is clearly a drama series, as from the start we see a Camille, a panicked young girl, walking the streets alone. As the camera angles cut between close up and tracking shots, the hermeneutic code creates quite a dramatic atmosphere, as the audience will want to know where Camille is going, why she looks so panicked and why she is out late in the evening. As well as this key scene, there are also other dramatic shots such as the bus crash and the suicide of mr Costa.

Another aspect of the show is the horror and supernatural side, which you could say is the dominant reading of the show, as it is based from ghosts and also frequently uses generic conventions of the horror genre. For example, we see a young boy (Victor) following Julie from a bus stop. This convention of a young child 'haunting' people can be seen in many films such as Insidious and the  silent twins in The Shining. Victor's character archetype is much like these, in that he is young, pale and acts in a strange way. This displays the producer's ideology of 'The Returned' people as he is the most stereotypical of them all. What subverts this, however, is Julie's unconventional reaction to Victor when she finally notices him. Although close up shots are used on Victor's face and eyes which may make the audience uncomfortable, Julie seems calm and even invites him into her own home. Her lack of fear is interesting, and by breaking convention it creates something which is much more individual to other programmes.

Using Stuart Hall's reception theory, we can gauge that this show isn't designed to have a preferred reading. Sure, a dominant ideology is displayed as we can clearly tell that the show is based on a mystery of the returned people, however the way that this mystery is portrayed doesn't fit into one genre. This means it is highly polysemic, and the frequent use of hermeneutic codes means that the audience doesn't know much and therefore must make up their own minds as the series progresses.

However, it is not only the genre of this show that makes it interesting and appeal to wider audiences. A more specialised audience that it may target is the band 'Mogwai', who produced and wrote the soundtrack used within 'Les Revenants'. What is interesting about them is that they aren't French like the show, but they are from Glasgow, and the music they create is quite niche - it is wholly instrumental, unlike most music. This makes their fans a specialised audience, and enables the show to target another audience which they may not have if the music hadn't been used, as well as giving it international appeal outside of France. It is also another item which fans of the show may use in order to create more of an immersive experience and connect with it better, and therefore by using vertical integration the producers have enabled themselves to have a much wider audience.

Overall, TV shows nowadays need to simultaneously target both mass audiences and specialised audiences as they have a lot more competition now that channels didn't face ten or twenty years ago as streaming didn't exist. By using several genres, they are able to target multiple audiences, as well as using 'Mogwai' in order to create more international appeal.

Friday, 2 December 2022

Researching Les Revenants

This set of tasks is frankly absolutely essential. But they are all as straightforward as possible, to ensure that you are able to complete them without a teacher present. This means that we can spend the time when I return working on more complicated and knotty issues, such as representation. 

So please take this seriously. This is an easy lesson, but we will not have any time to go over this again!

Please note before you start: while we refer to this show by it's correct, French title of Les Revenants, internationally it was released as 'The Returned'. So, when researching merchandise for this show, try googling 'the returned merchandise' or 'the returned tv show t shirts' or something. You can also search for Les Revenants as well. Go wild!

The Les Revenants EP by Mogwai


Les Revenants: absolute basic facts

Task 1 - please copy the following information in to a new blog post called 'Les Revenants research'

  • 26 November 2012 on Canal+
  • United Kingdom 9 June 2013 on Channel 4
  • 2 series, 8 episodes each
  • Based on the French film They Came Back (Les Revenants, dir. Robin Campillo 2004)
  • Created by Fabrice Gobert

Music



The soundtrack to Les Revenants is pretty atypical. This is partly because instead of being scored by a conventional composer, or being made up of a selection of music from other artists, it is written be a single band, Mogwai. 

Task 2 - research Mogwai


  • Who are Mogwai?
  • What kind of music do they make?
  • What does this mean? 
  • Jot down some facts about them
  • Why was this band in particular selected to compose the music for the French TV show Les Revenants?
  • What possible advantages does featuring Mogwai in this show have for audiences and the producers of this show?

Trailer 


This trailer is not for the original run of the show in French. Instead, it's for the Australian DVD release of this show. So this trailer gives you a fairly good indication of how this show was marketed to foreign (as in not French) audiences.

Task 3 - Watch and analyse the below trailer


How does this trailer target it's audiences? What techniques does it use? And how does it appeal to potential new audiences?

Merchandise


While Les Revenants is a highly atypical show, it still does have a smattering of merchandise, both official and unofficial that can be found online. This is an excellent example of not only producers minimising risk and maximising profit through vertically integrated business practices (Hesmondhalgh), but it's also an excellent example of audiences interacting with this confusing TV show in completely new ways (Jenkins).

Task 4 - research and screenshot examples of merchandise for The Returned, both official and unofficial


Canal+


Canal+ is the name of the 'channel' that commissioned and funded Les Revs. However, Canal+ is a very different TV channel to something like Channel 4 (which is funded commercially and in part by the licence fee), AMC (an American 'basic cable' channel that is primarily funded through advertising but also increasingly through international franchising of it's often wildly popular TV shows) or even the BBC (a UK conglomerate that is funded primarily through a state mandated licence fee, which makes the BBC 'public access'). Canal+ is a bit different.

Task 5 - Spend five minutes researching Canal+.


They're big! So only include the most straightforward facts. Who are they? How did they start? How much money do they have? What notable shows do they have? How are they funded? Etc!

Regulatory issues


Regulation refers to the rules and restrictions that a media product must face. In the UK, TV is regulated by OFCOM, and DVDs, other physical releases and theatrical releases are regulated by the BBFC.

The principal way in which the BBFC regulate media products is to 

  1. Take in to account the context of any sex, violence, swearing, and so on, and 
  2. Assess the potential harm and offense caused to the target audience

Task 6 - harm and offense in Les Revenants


Monday, 19 December 2022

The television industry is a specialised industry. Explore how The Returned is a product of a specialised industry

Example introduction

When an industry is specialised, this means that it does one thing extremely well. In this essay, I shall argue that Les Revenants is the product of a specialised industry, and could only be made by a producer that specialises in TV production. Les Revenants is a French language, highly atypical horror TV show that first broadcast in 2012.

What kind of TV show is Les Revenants?

  • Niche audience 
  • Flexi-narrative multi strand narrative, typical of TV show
  • Complex
  • Stereotypically French 
  • Slow paced
  • Weird 
  • Atypical
  • High Budget
  • Polysemic
  • Dark
  • Depressing
  • Washed out colour palette
  • Mysterious
  • Hermeneutic
  • Unsettling
  • Confusing
  • Complex

Questions

  • What is Canal +?
  • What other shows does Canal + put out?
  • Budget
  • Funding
  • International distribution
  • Production: how was it made? Who made it? Etc
  • Revenue: earnings!
  • Advertising: both nationally and internationally

Findings - what kind of organisation is Canal +?



  • Canal + is a multinational conglomerate. It owns a number of different channels, including Canal +, Cine Grande, Canal + Series, Canal + Foot, Canal + Kids, which indicates that it is horizontally integrated. However it also produces films, and has its own international digital streaming services, which means that it is also vertically integrated. In short, it is absolutely massive. A show like Les Revs is only possible to be produced by an enormous company like Canal +
  • International distribution: in order to minimise risk and to maximise profit, Canal + chose to distribute and licence this show internationally. It was first broadcast in the UK on Channel 4, a channel with a reputation for edgy and experimental television. Channel 4 is funded through a mixture of traditional advertising and the UK TV licence. It was distributed in America on the Sundance channel, an independent, small US channel that specialises in international films and TV shows. By distributing this show internationally in a variety of different contexts, it allows the producer to minimise risk and to maximise profit, something that is only possible for the TV industry. 
  • The first series of Les Revenants cost $11million, which categorises this show as a surprisingly high budget. It was funded through a variety of sources, including a funding grant from Creative Europe, which amounted to 45000 euro for the first series, and a million for the second. This varied form of funding is typical for less commercially successful TV shows. In doing so, this promotes French national culture, and presents France in a positive light. This can ultimately increase foreign tourist investment. The show features many montages of attractive scenes of the beautiful French countryside 

Paragraph starters

  1. Les Revenants is a niche show that targets a niche audience, and this is reflected in the funding of the show, which is highly typical of the television industry…
  2. Les Revenants is produced by Canal +, French based, internationally minded conglomerate that charges a monthly subscription fee for its premium service. This means that Les Revenants reflects the high production values of it’s producer…
  3. While the primary audience for Les Revenants is a domestic, French audience, the show also targets an international audience. This is typical of a specialised, multinational media conglomerate…

Tuesday, 7 January 2020

TV mini mock: exemplar answers

Teacher example 1


Compared with the past, David Gauntlett argues that in the media today ‘we no longer get singular, straightforward messages about ideal types of male and female identities.’ Evaluate the validity of this claim with reference to the set episode of Humans and Les Revenants

Identity refers not only to the ways in which audiences can identify with representations in media products, but also the way in which said identities are encoded by the media producer. As Gauntlet states, these once stereotypical identities have shifted over time, and have been replaced with far more complicated, and often atypical representations of men and women, in order to appeal specifically to a range of niche audiences. In order to explore this idea, I shall be referring to Humans, a Channel 4 sci-fi/drama first broadcast in 2015 and a remake of the Swedish Real Humans, and the French horror/drama hybrid Les Revenants, first broadcast in France on Canal+ and created by Fabrice Gobert.
Perhaps the most complicated representation of female identity in Humans is the character of Anita. A cyborg or ‘synth’, kidnapped by thieves and reprogrammed, Anita is renamed by the stereotypically British Hawkins family and put to work as a maid. Anita fulfils her role as a stereotypical woman perfectly. The mise-en-scene of her costume emphasises her stereotypical hegemonic status as a maid. This is further anchored through her performance. Her clear-cut British accent and warm yet robotic delivery allows her to control the behaviour of the youngest daughter. In one excellent scene, Anita prepares a ‘perfect breakfast’. The mise-en-scene of the food at the breakfast table, framed in a montage of mid shots and close ups reinforces Anita’s hegemonic status as a perfect mother, cleaner and maid. Her presence in the house forms a binary opposition with Laura, a flustered, hard-working lawyer, who presents a particularly atypical representation of Anita. Laura demonstrates a distrust of Anita for disrupting her family life. In a conversation between the two women, lit by low-key lighting in a stereotypical middle class setting, Laura expresses frustration at having to deal with Anita, and calls her a “stupid machine.
However, Anita is actually Mia, a ‘conscious synth’ capable of love and other emotions. By having her memory wiped and forced in to being a ‘perfect woman’, Anita is an excellent example of a hyperreal representation, where the fake is more appealing than the actual thing that it is representing. By positioning audiences in the uncomfortable situation of the Hawkins family, the audience are forced to confront how unpleasant the stereotypical representation of women as an object used to cook, clean and have sex with really is. In this sense, Anita can be seen to be a complicated and atypical representation of women, and an allegory for how women are treated in society.
On the subject of sexualisation, Anita’s looks are instantly used as a ‘selling point’ when the Hawkins family purchase her. The youngest daughter delightedly announces “I hope she’s pretty!”, emphasising the role that hegemonic attractiveness plays in a patriarchal society that makes huge expectations of the way that women look. However, Anita is nowhere near as sexualised as Niska, another synth sold in to Slavery. Unlike Anita, Nisha has retained her memories, and experiences frustration at being captured. As Leo, her former commander enters the brothel where Niska is being held, the camera takes a voyeuristic mode of address, slowly zooming in to Niska as she herself directly addresses the camera. Through her performance, she symbolically encodes sexuality through the gesture of her pout, and by pushing her breasts together in a stereotypically sexualised manner. However, as soon as Leo enters, the mask slips, and Niska resumes being a ‘normal woman’. Judith Butler argues that gender performativity and the ways in which we ‘act out’ our gender through gestures, costumes and other proairetic aspects shape and influence the world around us. Arguably, Niska’s appearance as a stereotypical and even hyperreal representation of a sex worker manipulates and influences the world around her, reinforcing hegemonic gender norms that she does not wish to live up to.
In a final, particularly unpleasant scene, Niska is sexually assaulted by a client. As he roughly initiates intercourse with her, the camera slowly zooms in to her face, emphasising the pain the she feels. Niska announces that “I was born to feel pain” earlier in the episode, reaffirming her humanity. The target the heterosexual male audience are forced to confront the particularly un-erotic shot of her pained face towards the end of the episode in a particularly uncomfortable mode of address, further emphasising the extent to which gender roles have shifted.
Les Revenants, too presents complicated and atypical representations of gender, particularly of women. However, while Humans is primarily focused on sex work and patriarchal hegemony, Les Revenants instead is based on the binary opposition between sex and death. One excellent example of this is the character of Simon. Simon, particularly harmonically attractive, lives up to stereotypical gender roles from his first appearance. When entering the ‘Lake Pub’ bar, Simon is particularly pushy, and directly confronts several people. His pushy nature is emphasised and anchored through the mise-en-scene of his craggy, grumpy face, and the symbolic code of his costume, the suit which he was buried in. Simon is a stereotypical representation of masculinity. However, Simon finds his masculinity subverted several times. After being approached and chatted up by the hegemonically attractive Lena at the pub, the audience are positioned in a stereotypically titillating preferred reading, where we take sexual gratification from two attractive characters conversing. Lena herself is atypical, and just as pushy as Simon, drunkenly announcing ‘buy me a drink and I’ll take you [to where you want to go]. Simon abandons Lena quickly for another woman, the one he is searching for. At this stage, Simon represents a particularly atypical representation of male identity, and starts to emotionally bang his fists against the door and cry and she refuses to open. Simon is a stereotypical, archetypal heartthrob. His character is perhaps included to appeal to the teenage female secondary audience of the programme. However, by demonstrating both stereotypical and atypically emotional traits, he can be seen to be an atypical representation of male identity, and far more complex that traditional representations.
Perhaps the most atypical representation of female identity is Julie, however. While previous hegemonically presented gender roles would see women in their late-20’s and early 30’s as mothers and housewives, Julie bucks the trend by being a complicated and difficult to understand character. While Julie has stereotypically French features and a slim build, she is presented, through her lack of makeup and through her lack of sexualisation as not hegemonically attractive. In a sense, she forms a binary opposition with the sexually objectified Lena. Van-Zoonen argues that gender is encoded through media language. Julies oversized jumpers and popped collars are both stereotypically masculine and resit sexualisation through not flattering her form. Her lack of discernible make-up demonstrates to the audience that she is both subversive, atypical and does not conform to female standards of hegemonic attractiveness. 
In a pivotal scene, Julie is stalked by victor, the ‘creepy child’ so very conventional of the horror genre. The threat of the scene is anchored through the proairetic code of the setting, as Julie makes her way back through the intricate mise-en-scène of run-down concrete roads and imposing, concrete buildings. Audiences aware of the horror genre and its conventions will be expecting a jump scare or something else appropriate.
However, Julie completely rejects these stereotypical associations. As she looks out of the window of her flat, the audience positioned with her and through a high angled extreme long shot of her stalker, Julie does not scream, but instead simply intone “what’s he doing out so late?”. This atypical representation of femininity is important for audiences watching this show. As a non-sexualised, powerful and capable young woman, Julie gives young female audiences a character to relate to and look up to. Her complicated and nuanced representation also confirms that Les revenants is a niche show, aimed at a cult audience. A more commercially viable show would have sexualised Julie in order to appeal to a heterosexual male audience, as Van-Zoonen argues, the sole function of women in a media product is to be the focus of a heterosexual male gaze. 
Yet not every representation is quite as atypical and subversive. The character of Joe, the father, presents a stereotypical and old-fashioned representation of male identity. For example, in a telling scene when Laura returns from a business trip, she is greeted with a montage of the mise-en-scène of messy shoes and an untidy house. That Joe cannot keep order and tidiness reinforces that there is a binary opposition between men and women, and his performativity of gender actually necessitates employing a hyperreal woman, Anita, in order to help him sort his life out. While he is not a main character by any stretch of the imagination, he is one of several straightforward representations of male identity in Humans, which only emphasises how much more challenging the representations of female identity are in this show.
In conclusion, I have explored how both Humans and Les Revenants present subversive and atypical representations of the typical and ‘ideal’ male and female identities that audiences are familiar with. Gauntlets’ assertion is clearly applicable here, though it is worth noting that both Humans and Les Revenants are atypical, cult shows appealing to a smaller and more enthusiastic audience. While Van Zoonen argued that the female body is used to position and to pleasure heterosexual male audiences, we also see examples of sexualisation here, most notably the characters of Niska and Lena in Humans and Les Revenants respectively. However, both shows present complicated and profound messages about the ideal types of female representations and identities in particular, and both shows present a challenging and highly allegorical experience for their cult target audiences. 

Teacher Example 2


Jean Baudrillard suggested that “We live in a world where there is more and more information, and less and less meaning.” Evaluate the extent to which this postmodernist statement applies Humans and Les Revenants


Jean Baudrillard was a postmodern media theorist, who argued that the modern world was far too confusing to make any sense of, and therefore that we were now living in a world without any meaning. This alarming statement is best summed up by his notion of hyperreality. Simply put, given that we are bombarded with so many ‘fake’ and highly constructed representations of reality, we are as a society unable to differentiate between reality and fiction. Ultimately, we choose instead to embrace the hyperreal, and to forget the confusing real which has been erased. I shall argue that we do indeed live in a world where there is more information than ever, and that media products have developed their ideological perspectives in order to reflect this confusing reality. In order to explore this thesis, I shall explore Human, a sci-fi TV show first broadcast by Channel 4 in 2005, itself a remake of the Swedish show Real Humans, and Les Revenants, a highly atypical horror show first broadcast in France by canal+ in 2012, once more a remake of a film of the same name.
Humans focuses on the lives of cyborgs and their owners. Set in an alternative present day Britain almost completely like our own, the cult, middle aged and middle class target audience are at once bombarded by a complicated array of representations and ideological themes encoded by the producer. By far the most salient and affecting example of hyperreality is the character of Mia/Anita. A cyborg with a consciousness and an ability to feel empathy, Mia is kidnapped early on in the show’s complicated and non-linear narrative, and is purchased by the Hawkins family, themselves a hyperreal stereotype of middle class, middle England sensibilities. When Anita is first introduced to the household, her hyperreal beauty is demonstrated through the use of close-up. Her hair, subtle makeup and plain, yet appealing costume present her as a hyperreal representation of womanhood, both sexually alluring yet sexless and motherly. A closeup shot of the son, Toby, biting his lower lip in proairetic sexual arousal and Joe, the husband’s attention of Anita’s ’18 + plus sex mode’, here presented through the mise-en-scene of a small card, confirms Anita’s stats as a sexualised object as opposed to the full and complicated woman the omniscient audience knows her to be. In this sense, the audience are forced to make sense of a confusing an contradictory narrative, a highly typical aspect of postmodernism.
Anita’s status as hyperreal extends to the performance of her gender and how this profoundly affects the Hawkins family. On the first morning of her servitude, the family are seen emerging in to the stereotypically middle class setting of their living room to be confronted with a montage of mid-shots of the mise-en-scene of an idealised perfect breakfast. The youngest girl, herself obsessed with Anita as some kind of enormous doll playfully asks “is this a party”? to which Joe, the father replies “this is what breakfast is supposed to be like!”. This statement is both telling and important. Breakfast is clearly defined by its status as the first meal of the day. However, Joe is essentially admitting the real breakfasts that they have eaten previously have actually been fake, under par. Anita’s elaborate breakfast spread is ‘perfect’, with pots of jam, and rounds of toast, as reinforced through consistent mid-shots of the scene and setting. By presenting the Hawkins family with a hyperreal breakfast, Anita is demonstrating not only her ability to create a perfect and hyperreal event, but also the fact that she is a hyperreal woman. We can refer to Butlers notion of gender performativity here. Anita’s performativity as a perfect woman, both Madonna and whore (to refer to Freud) clearly upsets Laura, the ‘TV ugly’ mother, who presents a binary opposition to Anita through her hegemonically less attractive looks. Laura barks at Anita to get out of the way, to which Anita instantly does so. Mathilda, the daughter, is also aware of the power of Anita’s hyperreal performativity. After Toby defends her bullying of Anita (Matty calls her a ‘dishwasher’, a deliberately pejorative term denying her humanity), Matilda snaps back “I can guess why you like her so much, crusty sheets”. 
The target audience watching this scene will be forced to negotiate a range of responses as according to Hall’s notion of audience reception. However, the number of roles that Anita plays (lover to Leo, sex object to Toby and Joe, sexual threat to Laura, dolly to the little girl and an object to torture for Matty) demonstrates exactly how complicated this representation really is.  Humans is a deeply allegorical show, and it utilises this Baudrillardian notion of a lack of meaning and a deliberately confusing mode of address to present a complicated and even contradictory set of ideological values to its audience.
As we shall see, Les Revenants also dwells on sex as a key theme. Yet Humans presents sex in a complicated, atypical, and frankly horrifying way. In a final, short sequence, Niska, like Anita kidnapped and forced to do something against her will, takes the role of prostitute. Her costume is stereotypical, and the connotative symbolism of her red bustier and the highly performative gestures of her clasping her breast both confuse and entice the audience earlier. However, in her final sequence of the episode, Niska is raped by a punter, pushed down, and forced in to sex. She is demonstrated to lack agency. A slow tracking closeup of her face, moving ever closer to her pained eyes forces the heterosexual male target to empathise with her, and to question and feel disgust at the ways in which women are treated in a deeply misogynistic and patriarchally implemented hegemonic society. This scene is played within a larger montage where a diegetic, calm, male scientists voice assures the audience that synths (cyborgs) cannot feel pain and cannot have a consciousness. Niska’s expression, of course, presents the audience through diametric opposition with the harrowing truth that what we are being told is untrue. Without being able to trust the narrative, we are instead forced to embrace the hyperreal, and come to our own difficult conclusion through negotiation, a highly postmodern process.
Les Revenants demonstrates a similarly postmodern perspective, perhaps even more so that Humans. Les Revenants narrative is extremely atypical in the sense that, far from typical horror narratives, it presents a range of hermeneutic codes encoded within the media language, without ever explicating these for the audience. In short, Les Revenants arguably means nothing, and allows the audience an opportunity to negotiate it in any way they wish. It can be read as an extreme example of Jenkins theory that the audience have absolute authority in decoding the ideological perspective of the producer (completely shattering Gerbner’s early assertion that TV cultivates ideology in a straightforward way), and even harks back to Barthe’s much earlier ‘death of the author hypothesis’
An excellent example of Les Revenants deliberately confusing and highly postmodern story telling occurs in the final sequence. After confusingly announcing to the audience that the events that they are seeing are occurring four years earlier, a long take of the hyperreal representation of the setting of the Seurat families stereotypically middle-class household occurs. It is revealed, again through a static long take, that Camille, who is shortly to die before ‘coming back to life’ and Lena are actually identical twins, and are even interchangeable (“could you tell us apart”? Lena disturbingly whispers to her boyfriend during sex). The scene then goes on to cross cut between Lena losing her virginity and Camille, now on a coach to. A school tip, apparently feeling the effects of Lena loosing her virginity. The sex scene is controversial (both actors appear underaged) yet conservatively shot. The warm hues of Lena’s bedroom and the warm mise-en-scène of the sheets and the pink of her cheeks forms a binary opposition with the coldness of Camille’s situation. Bathed in blue and in a particularly unflattering and bulky costume, Camille begins to panic, screaming at the bus driver, and placing the audience in a deliberately uncomfortable mode of address. Suddenly, the mysterious victor, a child with an atypically old-fashioned haircut and strange, staring face is introduced in mid to close up. Once more he forms a binary opposition between the panicking Camille. As the coach plummets off the cliff, the audience are once more positioned with Camille in an intense yet also calm birds’ eye, extreme long shot first person tracking sequence, plummeting off the cliff. The hard cut to black is, of course, highly symbolic of death and finality. 
In French, a colloquial term for ‘orgasm’ translates as ‘the little death. The audience, rightly confused by the extremely atypical and complicated turn of events are forced to rely on symbolism to make sense of an arguably nonsensical story. Les Revenants certainly does not have mainstream appeal. Its cult audience is small yet devoted, and, in order to be financed, the show was in part funded by the unlikely source of the French Alps tourist board. Once more, the extremely complicated, deliberately controversial, upsetting and potentially meaningless narrative of Les Revenants functions as a postmodern product, criticising and creating entertainment from a world that has lost all meaning.
Baudrillard argued "We live in a world where there is more and more information, and less and less meaning.” Throughout Humans and Les Revenants, we see irrefutable examples of this. From the complexity and meaninglessness of Les Revenants narrative, to the complicated and conflicting representations of gender performativity in humans, the audience are forced to confront a world they do not quite understand. However, in each instance, a highly allegorical meaning is constructed through hermeneutics. Both shows reflect on the nature of life, love, sex, death, and how all are linked. While it may be true that we live in a world too complicated to understand, both shows impart to the viewer that, conversely, we can still make sense of the world through certain universal truths, no matter how meaningless things seem. 

Student example 1


Jean Baudrillard suggested that “We live in a world where there is more and more information, and less and less meaning.” Evaluate the extent to which this postmodernist statement applies Humans and Les Revenants


Jean Baudrillard’s theory of Post Modernism suggests the boundaries between the real world and the world of the media have collapsed and it is no longer possible to distinguish what is reality and what is simulation. As a result of this, we are in a situation where pieces of media seem more ‘real’ than the reality they supposedly represent. This is also referred to as hyperreality. I will be arguing that both Humans an Les Revenants portray many aspects of post modernism
Moreover, hyperreality in ‘Humans’ is conveyed through Anita as she can be seen as the ‘perfect mum’ to Sophie rather than Laura who is her actual mother. Anita is constructed as a hyperreal person through the mis en scene of her voice as when she reads to Sophie it is done with an element of enthusiasm and enjoyment. Sophie herself clearly prefers Anita as she constantly asks for her to read rather than her own mother. During the breakfast scene, Anita constructs a hyperreal breakfast, one of which the audience would not have been able to relate to. She has all the elements of a full breakfast laid out onto the table and the families dismay is evident as soon as they walk in. They all seemed shocked to actually be having breakfast together at a table, which is another example of the fake being better than the real, as it can be argued that the mis en scene of the food on the table is simply aesthetics rather than real physical emotions. We are placed in a voyeuristic manner within this scene as it is almost as if we are physically at the table. This is a simulation of a stereotypical family breakfast.
Adding on, Anita’s stereotypical, hegemonically attractive persona allows her to be placed as a very own hyperreal exploitation as synths can do no wrong. In the ‘real’ world humans are accustoms to making mistakes as this is part of life so placing Anita as this robotic ‘angel’ creates a post modernistic interpretation among her. Joe might actually prefer Anita to Laura due to the very fact that she isn’t real which makes the narrative of the series extremely hard to follow. The producer has done this deliberately to amplify the effects in which post modernism is having amongst society today. This is what Baudrillard argued within his theory that we do indeed get mixed up between what is real and fake. The diegetic sound of Anita’s voice presents a hyperreal representation of women and is almost setting standards of how women should behave and act, Anita herself could be an allegory for everything that is wrong with the world and maybe her schizophrenia type personalities could represent how some people within society put up a front. Anita and Joe’s sex scene is particularly uncomfortable for the middle aged, working class target audience as Joe is having intercourse with a helpless ‘person’. This is a proairetic code as the mis en scene of Joe placing the other 18 card into his back pocket earlier on in the episode prepares the audience for this particularly distressful event. Baudrillard’s statement that we live in a world of more and more information and less and less meaning is constructed throughout this episode of Humans and atypical narrative agrees with this ideology.
Les revenants also abides to Baudrillard’s theory of post modernism as it is constantly representing hyperreal situations through the use of hermeneutic codes. The mis en scene of Lena’s white dress in her sex scene connotes youth and purity and is again, like Humans, an uncomfortable scene for the audience as Lena is a young girl and the target audience is middle aged. Whilst this is going on, Camille is experiencing a lot of pain, seemingly perhaps a panic attack and it is clear she is in trouble through the mis en scene of her panicked face. Perhaps here the producer is connoting that even if sex is enjoyable whilst it is ongoing, it can only really bring one element. Pain. Moreover, a diametric opposition is formed through the blue coach and the purple sheets when Lena is having sex. A polysemic meaning is that Camille is acting out what Lena is feeling and this can be directly linked to Judith Butlers theory of gender performativity where she argues identity is a performance which is constructed through a series of acts and expressions that we carry out. Once more, the voyeuristic bird eye view. close up shot of Lena and her boyfriend allows the audience to be positioned as if we are actually there whilst they’re getting intimate.  A post modernistic interpretation of sex is being acted out here as it is shown in a light which makes it seemingly unbelievable and a must have thing in life.
Victors stalking of Julie is both eerie but yet somewhat the audience feels sympathy as his character is so young. These multiple genre conventions form generic hybridity which allows the producer to manipulate the audience. Baudrillard argued that audiences are bombarded with images which no longer refer to anything real. Julie conforms to this as the mis en scene of her looking out the window and the long shot of Victor in the grass conveys she does not believe what she is seeing and therefore she may perhaps be seeing a simulation.
To conclude, both Humans and Les Revenants agree with Jean Baudrillard’s theory of post modernism as they construct hyperreal situations and events within society. They also create a world where the fake is better than the real.

Student example 2


Liesbet Van-Zoonen argues that media language encodes how male and female characters act in media products. Explore how representations position the audience in Humans and Les Revenants
Humans


Liesbet Van Zoonen’s theory can be applied to Humans and les Revenants as we can explore how gender is constructed through the codes and conventions in the media product. She argues that female characters are placed in a media product to appeal to a heterosexual male audience, as the representations of women and men are constructed and portrayed in different ways which changes the position of the audience and how they view that character. Humans is a sci fi TV show that that was broadcasted in 2015 and it stems from the Swedish show, and Les revenants is a thriller TV show that is French. I agree with Liesbet Van Zoonens theory and I will argue that both Humans and Les Revenants use subversive representations of women which will sometimes position the audience in uncomfortable positions and make the audience feel on edge.
In the show Humans, there is a clear representation of women that the producers want to show which is first shown through the narrative construction, for example towards the beginning of the episode the Hawkins family go to a shop to buy a synth (robot) and the youngest daughter says “What if she is not pretty?” which links back to Liesbet Van Zoonens theory of the ‘Male gaze’ that a female character is  placed in a media product for the male audience. The daughters own naïve and childish expectations position the audience and force them to construct their own expectations. There is also a representation of Asia women that is shown as Anita is played by an East Asian woman in both the original and British version and this fulfils the stereotype of subversive, dosmesticity and exotic sexuality as the mise-en-scene- of her simple makeup and perfectly straight hair portrays a hegemonically attractive woman that will appeal to a male audience. When Anita is unveiled, it is anchored through a heavenly 'boot up' noise emphasising her status as pure which is also encoded through her ‘start up’ process as she is portrayed to be brand new. The ‘boot up’ noise can also interpret to be sexualised as she is innocent and positions the audience to almost comfort Anita. Anita functions as a threat for the mother as throughout their attractiveness is compared and there are threats of colonialism, she is also seen as a sexual object for the son and for her Husband Joe which encodes the meaning that women are seen as sexual objects. This can be shown when joe casually flirts with Anita, which shows that audience that he is attracted to her which initially makes the audience question Joe as she is at this point just a ‘synth’, this also shows a negative representation of men from the way Joe gazes at Anita as commits to the stereotype that men only want one thing.
Throughout the media product, narrative construction encodes how the characters are portrayed, this can be shown as Anita is referred to as a ‘she’, showing gender performativity and personification. The preferred reading for the audience is to see Anita as a compelling, and interesting character, however there is an Intradiagetic gaze as the characters view Anita in different ways depending on the gender role, For, example Matty with hatred and frustration and the son with undisguised lust she is referred to “crusty sheets’ which has connotations to a typical teenage boy. This position the audience in a weird and uncomfortable manor as the son views Anita as some type of ‘sex toy’. Anita adopts the role of both a maid and a mother which is controversial in the show, this is shown when the mother says “she’s not a slave” and Matty replies with “that’s exactly what she is”, this deliberately positions the audience on either side of the debate, and to select and ideological perspective.
In Humans it explores the way women are treated in society which is allegorical and, in the ending, there is a close up shot of Niska’s face (when she is in a brothel), the montage positions the audience in a deliberately uncomfortable position. This can also be shown in Les revenants which conforms to Liesbet van Zoonens argument, this is evidence in the sex scene with Lena and her boyfriend, the Birds eye view close up of Lena and her boyfriend positions us with them, which feels uncomfortable and weird, positioning us is a voyeuristic way. This is also anchored through the use of low-key lighting which connotes intimacy, privacy and ultimately, sex and this is contrasted with the mid-shot of Lena wearing a white vest top which represents purity and virginity. This also deliberately positions the audience with the character and acts as a direct mode of address and Lena in this scene is portrayed to be a young teenager as Lena pulling a ‘sickie’ to sneak in her boyfriend positions the audience in a relatable moment.  A polysemic meaning is used to encode how the female characters act in this media product as Camille (other twin) is acting out what Lena is really feeling, showing gender performativity, this shows the idea that Lena is doing what she is meant to do whereas Camille is freaking out. Camille is at on the school bus when this is happening and the action of her almost gasping for air, positions the audiences in a distressing way, as her reacting like that takes away the stereotype that sex is meant to be for pleasure not pain. At the beginning of the episode Camille’s entrance is emphasized a through stereotypical horror film soundtrack, and it represents a generic cliché that young girls are threatening and creepy which makes the audience question how females are presented. In response to the question i agree with Lisbet Van Zoonen's argument.

Student example 3


Liesbet Van-Zoonen argues that media language encodes how male and female characters act in media products. Explore how representations position the audience in Humans and Les Revenants


As a collective, Lisbet Van Zoonen argues that gender is constructed through encodes and conventions of media products, and the idea of what male/female is changes over a period of time. In this essay, I will be exploring how representations of different genders positions the target audience in different ways. I will further be demonstrating my ideological perspective through analysing Humans, a stereotypical TV sci-fi genre and Les Revenants, an unconventional horror genre tv show (aired on Cannel +). Positioning can be defined as where the audience are placed within a media product.
In Humans (Leo enters the brothel), the scene starts with Leo situated in a bleak setting, this is demonstrated through mise-en-scene of the low developed setting and low key lighting. The straight cut from Anita reading a story to the brothel scene acts as a diametric opposition, therefore from the start of the scene, the audience is already positioned in an uncomfortable way, thus forming an eased mode of address. In the key scene, Niska (played by Emily Berrington) is emphasising her breasts which is a form of sexualisation, this shows a stereotypical representation of a hegemonically attractive female. Additionally, throughout the episode Leo (played by Collin Morgan) represents a strong dominant male, however when he meets Niska he breaks characters as they are happy to see each other. The mise-en-scene of Leo's dark green clothing acts a symbolic code for the reason that it has military connotations, emphasising his power. Although happy to see each other, it is clearly evident that Leo has dominance over Niska, potentially showing patriarchal hegemony. Through Leo showing his emotions, it is an example of gender performativity which was implemented by Jude Butler. This effects the audience as it makes them question the representation of Leo as he is shown as a dominant male up until this point. It can be concluded that the preferred reading of this scene is unpleasant and disturbing.
A key scene that shows significant representations and places the audience within the media product is the Simon and Adele scene.The mid-shot of Adele's shouting and crying is symbolic as it shows her feelings, this positions the audience through making us feel sympathetic. Furthermore the non-diegetic soundtrack, produced by a band called Mogwai, combined with the low key lighting functions as a proairetic code as it foreshadows something bad will happen to her. In combination of all these elements, the mise-en-scene of Adele's white dress acts as a symbolic code as it has a deeper meaning of innocence and purity. A binary opposition is created through Adeles feminine white dress and Simon's dark, black suit. The black suit demonstrates that Simon is a strong yet potentially dangerous character, therefore the representation of Simon is of a stereotypical man and Adele is represented as a stereotypical woman. Consequently, this positions the audience in a satifactory place because it makes the target audience easily relate to the characters, however a combination of Simon's aggressive banging on the door and Adele crying acts as a hermeneutic code. The audience are placed in a confusing position through this. This relates to Lisbet Van Zoonen's theory as men and women are being represented differently within a media product.
Furthermore, a scene in humans that agin represents gender differently and positions the audience to make judgements on gender is in the breakfast scene. In this scene, the representation of family and women are particularly fundamental. Anita herself is a hyper-real construction. Gemma Chan who plays Anita is a more hegemonically attractive than Laura, this forms a powerful diametric opposition, a theory adapted by Claude-Levis Strauss, through demonstrating what is expected of a stereotypical female and what subverts it. While the mise-en-scene of Laura's facial features blemishes, the make up used on Anita enhances her facial features and is clearly used to show she is the more widely accepted female in society. When promoted by Joe the father, Anita reacts with a fake, empty and repetitive laugh. Through this Anita reinforces patriarchal hegemony. This positions the audience in a creeped out and irritated way as women in this scene are represented as potentially annoying and men as quite simple and basic.
Lastly, a scene in Les Revenants where representations are being subverted and atypical to position the audience is the Mr Costa killing scene. Producers can use subversive representations to manipulate the ideologies of the audience. In this scene, the high angle shot of Mrs Costa infers the power and strength that Mr Costa has over Mrs Costa. This potentially infers that the hyper-real small town in the Alps live in a society where patriarchal hegemony is evident. Moreover, the rope anchors the audience to show she is vulnerable and represents her as being weak, this positions the audience as wanting to help her but as a collective we can't do anything. However, it can argued that this is a fairly atypical and subversive response from Mrs Costa as she is not struggling to get out of the rope. This may symbolically suggest that in our modern day society, men have a dominance over women. Therefore it may be argued that this is an allegory. As a whole, through this, manipulating the audience through showing the producers ideologies makes it easier for the media product to sell. The only reason why any media product exits is too make money.
In conclusion, through the producer constructing complicated representation in both Les Revenants and Humans, it adapts as a whole an uncomfortable mode of address. It would make most audiences disturbed however it may be for this reason why the targeted audience may return to continue watching more episodes. This being a highly effective strategy to make more sales and money. 

Student example 4


Liesbet Van-Zoonen argues that media language encodes how male and female characters act in media products. Explore how representations of genders position the audience in Humans(Stereotypical representation of women) and Les Revenants(the same as Humans)


To begin, Van Zoonen believes that women are used in any media products to appeal to the stereotypical hegemony of society that that media product is representing. In my overall opinion, I believe that representation of genders are portrayed stereotypically to the hegemonic norm of a patriarchal society before everyone was treated equally.
For Humans, it’s displays women in a very stereotypical way. Such example of this is Anita in Humans, she is being portrayed as a house-wife or maid, doing the dishes, laundry, cooking and always says to Laura Hawkins that she was built to serve. What makes this fit to the Zeitgeist of women in the 1960’s is the intertextuality of Humans, such as the Women magazine. We can associate Anita’s actions with how women were treated when society was more patriarchal then egalitarian. For the audience, they are positioned by making Anita the main character of the story. Examples that put her as the main character includes marketing such as posters, and her flashback in episode 1, season 1, when Leo loses her when she gets kidnapped. Meaning that she has a key importance to Leo who also is portrayed as important in the plot of Humans.  With the audience knowing that she is the main character means that the producer wants the preferred reading to be that the audience follows her story as she seems to be the spine of episode 1, season 1. With this we can consider that the representations of the female gender in Humans is that they are treated as a household object, as she is forced to do all the house cleaning and cooking etc. An example of this objectification can be when Laura Hawkins calls her ‘you’re just a stupid machine’ with Anita replying ‘yes Laura’. For the audience, they are meant to feel sympathy for Anita and also feel like they’re in the same position, to feel angered by how the Hawkins family treats her such as Matty saying that she is a slave. Concluding that for Lisbet Van Zoonen’s theory, this can be considered that females match the hegemony of society, however this is more directed towards the 1960’s when women were portrayed more as house-wives, this suggests that the show Humans is an allegory, with Van Zoonen stating that women are still portrayed to appeal to a male heterosexual audience. With Humans being Anita’s story, the preferred reading is for the audience to associate themselves to Anita the most as she is the one found on all the marketing for the TV show. And with how the Hawkins family treat her, makes the audience feel bitter towards anyone else who treats her badly.
Additionally, Les Revenants follows the same format of following the portrayal of men and women stereotypically. To begin, the best scene to describe how each gender is represented is the diametric opposition between Adele in her white wedding dress, low-key lighting and being indoors, with Simone in his black suit, dark lighting and being outside. One mid-shot of this scene is when Adele collaspes against the front door, this is symbolic of her misery and her lost of sanity after Simone had supposedly died ten years before the tv show is set. The mise-en-scene of the high angle view makes her seem isolated, exposed, alone and weak which follows the stereotypical hegemony of society in the 1960's.
Furthermore, Humans also follows stereotypes of women but in another fashion as well as a house-wife. Theorist Sigmund Freud suggested that men, during his time, perceived women in one of two categories. He coined this the Madonna/ Whore complex, stating that women can either be a virgin, motherly, all caring, benevolent carer with great beauty or rather a whore, a character that craves intercourse, mostly prostitutes who want money. In this case Anita’s house-wife actions are contrasted by Niska, another synth in Humans. She also kidnapped and becomes a robotic prostitute. In episode 1 of season 1, Niska is portrayed as a whore according to Sigmund Freud. For one the mise-en-scene of the brothel when the character Leo enters it has high connotations to how women are represented. For one, Niska is wearing a stereotypical sex worker costume. Each prostitute is numbered, and not called by their real name, Leo says to the brothel owner that he’ll ‘have number 7’, which objectifies Niska and women as a whole yet again. Each prostitute is also in their own chamber as if they are in a zoo, being treated like animals, aka being treated as if they had lower status in society than men. Furthermore, the soundtrack of the brothel scene also makes it sound like an uninviting place to be in, the audience at this point follows Leo as he snakes around the brothel to find Niska, making us feel uncomfortable to be in the brothel. This follows Van Zoonen and Freud’s theories, that women are portrayed to be appealing to the male-gaze, or rather that media sexualises women; and that with the soundtrack making the audience feel uncomfortable with its exploitive nature demonstrates Freud’s belief that men portray the whore of the Madonna/Whore complex as scary and uncaringful, and the soundtrack follows this. This diametric opposition between Anita’s house-wife attitude and the objectification of synths in the brothel demonstrates Freud’s simple complex.
For the audience in this scene they follow Leo around the brothel could possibly show a rather atypical response but also stereotypical response on women. For atypical, Leo feels uncomfortable around the women, suggesting that he is fearful and unmanly, this of course is atypical to the stereotype that men are not afraid of anything and are brave, and with the audience being forced to follow him around the brothel, makes them feel uncomfortable to be around the women. This follows the stereotypical response that women that follow the whore part of the complex can be considered untrustworthy and scary. This can tie in to Stuart Hall’s reception theory, he states that when an audience is given a media product, they give three response to that product. For the producers preferred reading, he wants the audience to feel uncomfortable around the brothel, demonstrating an allegory that women should not be sexualised like this, following Van Zoonen’s theory but also tying in to how Freud’s theory demonstrates how wrong the whore is. For oppositional reading, this can be that women should be perceived to have a lower status in society and disgusting according heterosexual men, which Van Zoonen theory follows.