Revising the nouvelle vague and early French surrealist cinema
A bout de souffle
What is the goal, function and intended response of this film and the movement as a whole?
- Directly challenging old, traditional French cinema (le cinema du papa)
- To challenge morality itself and to align the spectator with the antagonist
- A focus on youthful and existentialism - it is unclear why Michel kills the police officer, reflects the changing expectations of French society
- Rejects the structure of classical Hollywood narrative
What contextual information and key facts are vital to understanding these films?
- Jump cuts added by Goddard for reasons of length… an example of serendipity!
- Filmed wild style/guerilla style on the streets of Paris. More authentic… and cheaper!
- Written by Francois Truffaut, another French new wave director!
- Cahiers du Cinema - a French film magazine still going today! The writers were obsessed with auteur theory, and American auteurs such as Alfred Hitchcock
- Goddard was communist and highly politically motivated
What elements of auteurism manifest in the debut features of these directors, and why is this a ridiculous question?
Auteur theory - a concept made up by Truffaut, suggesting that even in a Hollywood studio system, some directors rose to the status of ‘author’. Auteurs films share certain iconography and aesthetic elements. They make the same film again and again. Auteurs existed within a studio setting, yet made distinctive films regardless. Andrew Sarris in America introduced this theory to English speaking audiences
- Jump cuts: a film making mistake used for dramatic purposes. Confusing and alienating
- Aesthetic: cars. A blunt narrative device
- Guns: 'all you need to make a movie is a girl and a gun'
- Postmodern films: deliberately break the rules, eg breaking the fourth wall
- Cool young actors. E.g. Jean Seaburg, Jean-Paul Belmondo, Brigette Bardot
What are the distinctive elements of film form that characterise these films? What is the aesthetic of these films?
- A naturalistic film that uses improvisational performance style. Yet there are expressive elements, such as the eyebrow scene…
- Edgy elements, such as a criminal protagonist, and sexual situations
- Repeated motifs from other films, including intertextual references to Humphry Bogart
What is the goal, function and intended response of this film and the movement as a whole?
- To explore the subconscious mind and subconscious desires, the central concept of surrealism
- To go against old cinema, narrative cinema, Hollywood cinema
- To shock and discomfort the audience. Transgression: to go beyond socially accepted norms
- To criticise established French institutions: the church, the government/the state/ the bourgeoisie and the established order
What contextual information and key facts are vital to understanding these films?
- Bunuel and Dali associated with the surrealist movement, and associated with artists like Renee Magritte and especially Max Ernst
- Bunuel grew up in a tiny Spanish town called Calanda. The drums at the end of L’age D’or are a direct reference to a Calanda tradition
- L’age d’or instigated riots in Paris, and Bunuel and Dali had to hit from crowds with a bucket of rocks. The film was banned in many countries, including France for a few years, and the UK until 1986
- The Surrealist group collaborated with the communist party, associated with left wing politics
What elements of auteurism manifest in the debut features of these directors, and why is this a ridiculous question?
- Fetishistic images taken from dreams
- Sexual fetishism: nudity, tights, feet etc
- Shameful exploration of sexual practices
- Criticisms of the church, the bourgeoisie, and the police…
- Animals in strange places!
- A broken and non-linear narrative that resembles a dream
- Themes of societal pressures getting in the way of our desires
What are the distinctive elements of film form that characterise these films? What is the aesthetic of these films?
- Expressive films, yet there are some naturalistic elements, such as the use of relatable settings and naturalistic performance
- A surrealist aesthetic. Bleeding donkeys, priests being chucked out of windows, cows in beds… dreamlike and funny!
- Transgressive imagery. Sexual assault, ants spilling from a wound, an eyeball being split open, and overt blasphemy