Thursday, 12 June 2025

Revising the nouvelle vague and early French surrealist cinema

A bout de souffle



What is the goal, function and intended response of this film and the movement as a whole?


  • Directly challenging old, traditional French cinema (le cinema du papa)
  • To challenge morality itself and to align the spectator with the antagonist
  • A focus on youthful and existentialism - it is unclear why Michel kills the police officer, reflects the changing expectations of French society 
  • Rejects the structure of classical Hollywood narrative 


What contextual information and key facts are vital to understanding these films?



  • Jump cuts added by Goddard for reasons of length… an example of serendipity!
  • Filmed wild style/guerilla style on the streets of Paris. More authentic… and cheaper!
  • Written by Francois Truffaut, another French new wave director!
  • Cahiers du Cinema - a French film magazine still going today! The writers were obsessed with auteur theory, and American auteurs such as Alfred Hitchcock
  • Goddard was communist and highly politically motivated 



What elements of auteurism manifest in the debut features of these directors, and why is this a ridiculous question?


Auteur theory - a concept made up by Truffaut, suggesting that even in a Hollywood studio system, some directors rose to the status of ‘author’. Auteurs films share certain iconography and aesthetic elements. They make the same film again and again. Auteurs existed within a studio setting, yet made distinctive films regardless. Andrew Sarris in America introduced this theory to English speaking audiences


  • Jump cuts: a film making mistake used for dramatic purposes. Confusing and alienating
  • Aesthetic: cars. A blunt narrative device
  • Guns: 'all you need to make a movie is a girl and a gun'
  • Postmodern films: deliberately break the rules, eg breaking the fourth wall
  • Cool young actors. E.g. Jean Seaburg, Jean-Paul Belmondo,  Brigette Bardot



What are the distinctive elements of film form that characterise these films? What is the aesthetic of these films? 



  • A naturalistic film that uses improvisational performance style. Yet there are expressive elements, such as the eyebrow scene… 
  • Edgy elements, such as a criminal protagonist, and sexual situations
  • Repeated motifs from other films, including intertextual references to Humphry Bogart


L’age chien 





What is the goal, function and intended response of this film and the movement as a whole?


  • To explore the subconscious mind and subconscious desires, the central concept of surrealism 
  • To go against old cinema, narrative cinema, Hollywood cinema 
  • To shock and discomfort the audience. Transgression: to go beyond socially accepted norms 
  • To criticise established French institutions: the church, the government/the state/ the bourgeoisie and the established order


What contextual information and key facts are vital to understanding these films?


  • Bunuel and Dali associated with the surrealist movement, and associated with artists like Renee Magritte and especially Max Ernst
  • Bunuel grew up in a tiny Spanish town called Calanda. The drums at the end of L’age D’or are a direct reference to a Calanda tradition
  • L’age d’or instigated riots in Paris, and Bunuel and Dali had to hit from crowds with a bucket of rocks. The film was banned in many countries, including France for a few years, and the UK until 1986
  • The Surrealist group collaborated with the communist party, associated with left wing politics 

What elements of auteurism manifest in the debut features of these directors, and why is this a ridiculous question?


  • Fetishistic images taken from dreams 
  • Sexual fetishism: nudity, tights, feet etc
  • Shameful exploration of sexual practices
  • Criticisms of the church, the bourgeoisie, and the police…
  • Animals in strange places!
  • A broken and non-linear narrative that resembles a dream
  • Themes of societal pressures getting in the way of our desires  

What are the distinctive elements of film form that characterise these films? What is the aesthetic of these films?


  • Expressive films, yet there are some naturalistic elements, such as the use of relatable settings and naturalistic performance 
  • A surrealist aesthetic. Bleeding donkeys, priests being chucked out of windows, cows in beds… dreamlike and funny!
  • Transgressive imagery. Sexual assault, ants spilling from a wound, an eyeball being split open, and overt blasphemy