Friday 14 December 2018

Hyperreality, simulacrum and the Greater Cambridge Partnership

Hyperreality - where an audience is unable to distinguish between the real or a simulation


Simulation - a fake or a substitute


Simulacrum - a copy of a copy, or a representation of a representation


These three difficult to define terms are essential in understanding Jean Baudrillard's writings on postmodernism. In the very first media lesson, you were taught that signs create meaning through signification. But what if all a sign symbolises is another sign? What is actually real? Ultimately, postmodernism can be boiled down to a distrust of established norms and conventions, and a pervading uncertainty over what is real, or exactly what reality is in the first place.  

Baudrillard's writings initially come from a Marxist perspective, and as such, we see him challenging and critiquing concepts such consumerism and the exertion of power by the ruling class on the subject class. However, by the time he wrote the essays which became collected in Simulacres et Simulation (1981), Baudrillard had moved beyond the simplistic notion of a power struggle, and in to the very establishment of reality itself. Media products are primarily to blame, as films, TV programmes, videogames etc establish a new set of conventions which substitute themselves for reality. We find ourselves understanding our lives not through what they are, but through what they resemble.

This notion of simulacrum is essential for understanding the TV show Humans, and it is also especially important when exploring online media. Baudrillard died in 2007, and was well aware of the implications of digital technology, particularly the internet. He also explored the concept of artificial intelligence. His 2006 essay Deep Blue or the Computer's Melancholia explored the relationship between chess champion Gary Kasparov and the supercomputer Deep Blue. He mused how it was essential for Kasparov to win the game, for fear that humanity might loose face if proved inferior to it's own creation. Baudrillard may have been horrified to note that only a few years after his death, mobile phones (i.e a hand-sized computer) have won chess tournaments. 

This fear of the simulacrum becoming the real, and the notion of hyperreality being more real than reality evidently leads towards a sense of paranoia. Science fiction has always been a paranoid genre, with the allegorical themes that it evidences being strongly influenced by the sociohistorical context. Humans is concerned that very soon we will not able be able to tell the real from the hyperreal. And if we look at the example of Leo falling in love with Anita, we may actually prefer the hyperreal to the real.

This brings us back to the present. Through intertextual reference, we are familiar with robots, cyborgs, supercomputers, space travel and augmented reality. Many of these aspects exist only as representation, or at the very least are represented in such a way that is infeasible in reality (for example, consider the on-screen graphics popping up in Hollyoaks to inform the viewer what is in the text message they are receiving). 

The following promotional video produced by Cambridge Greater Partnership is designed to create a positive spin for a range of proposed public transport initiatives in Cambridge. However, the video swiftly begins to use a range of intertextual references to create a hyperreal narrative for the audience to consume. CG approximations are blended with real footage, digital overlays are liberally used, and digitally created synth pop punctuates the footage, anchoring the audience to believe (and trust) in a science fiction dreamland.

However, there are clear drawbacks to this utilisation of hyperreality. When second year media class Q block viewed the trailer, they announced that it was ominous and creepy. They're right. The autonomous 'AV pod' that scoops up a tired looking hospital worker and dumps her unceremoniously at her destination at Addenbrookes. It's an image straight out of dystopian science fiction stories. The soundtrack is bleak and miserable, connotative a an empty, if obsessively clean future.  Cambridge seems empty, bleak and grey. Usually crammed full of tourists, busses, crowds of cyclists and gridlocked cars, instead sparse groups of cyclists move in slow motion on grey, isolated cycle paths. The absolute annihilating flatness of the Cambridgeshire ens becomes a post apocalyptic landscape. The real kicker come with the on screen graphic announcing 'IT'S ALREADY BEGUN' in block capital, sans serif. The finality and the sternness of this statement, almost imperative in it's bluntness suggests a lack of agency. Emblazoned on a green background of the flatlands northwest of Cambridge city, the binary opposition between the current green optimism and the implicit threat of the intertitle is further reinforced by the green guided busway buses transformation in to a computer generated post production addition, alien and out of place in the flat void of the fens.

Is this, as Stuart Hall would say, the preferred response? Of course not! The preferred reading would be one of optimism, positivity, and pleasure at recognizing the intertextual motifs. Additionally, the audience can also take pleasure in the hyperreality, and in the blurring of fact and fiction. This is especially notable for a Cambridge audience. Again, when screening this promotional video to students, they excitedly (or scornfully...) pointed out the exact location of each landmark, even the non-descript Addenbrookes bridge and Milton - St.Ives cycleway. In this reading, the graphic 'I'TS ALREADY BEGUN' takes a softer approach, informing the audience they are in the safe hands of the Greater Cambridge Partnership. We can take pleasure in hyperreal representation, in seeing the familiar and the real being subverted, and can take comfort in a future that has, indeed, already begun.

The promotional video is embedded in this Cambridge News article. While you're there, check out the typically disparaging comments as an excellent example of the dichotomous and frustrating experience of negotiating hyperreality!















Wednesday 12 December 2018

Raheem Sterling, bias and ethnocentrism in newspaper reporting: a case study

Pretty sure the skyline story about the ebola virus should get
slightly more page space than 'young man goes clubbing'
Gerbner suggested that if an ideology is repeated by a media product with sufficient frequency and clarity, and if the audience consumes a significant amount of the same media, then there ideological perspective will be warped and cultivated to that of the ideology of the producer.

Newspapers are an excellent potential example of cultivation in action. Due to their generally daily frequency and often massive, national circulation figures, producers of newspapers are in a privileged position to present their ideology on a massive scale. Repetition is a powerful tool. Through repetition, a catchy song can become lodged in your head, a key fact can finally be understood, and you can learn a complex physical skill, like remaining upright on a bike. None of these things are likely to become so ingrained after only one exposure.

Twitter user Adam Keyworth outlined the many instances of how British newspapers have criticised the footballer Raheem Sterling. In most cases, these criticisms have nothing to do with his football ability. In many cases, the criticisms are typical tabloid muckraking. There are accusations of partying too hard, of having poor taste, of being paid too much. There are also strange, oppositional accusations of being thrifty. Shopping at Poundland, taking a Ryanair budget flight, or shopping in Primark.

The number one offender is the right wing tabloid The Sun, though other right wing tabloids like The Daily Mail and The Star also feature. Criticism of footballers, and of public figures in general is commonplace in tabloids. However, the sheer number of these reports, and Sterling's ethnicity makes things significantly more complicated.

Unfortunately, like many black and ethnic minority footballers, Sterling has been subject to racist taunts. As The Sun themselves reported on 11th December

The Met Police are probing claims the player was called a “f****** black c***”.
The 60-year-old, from Beckenham, in South East London, apologised for his actions but denied he was a racist, telling the Daily Mail: “I’m deeply ashamed by own behaviour and I feel really bad.
"But I didn’t call him a black c***, I called him a Manc c***.”

What a nice guy...

Whether you believe him or not, there is a long history of football fans across the world demonstrating racist behaviour, from chants, throwing objects at players, and in one case harassing a black commuter.

As media students, you must consider to what extent audiences are influenced by news media. There are of course a range of factors that determine an individual's ideology, including upbringing, location, social class and so on. However, persistent exposure to media may also be responsible for the manipulation of ideology, or at the very least the legitimisation of certain ideological perspectives.

Naturally, when The Sun was accused of promoting racist ideologies, it went on the defence, stating

The suggestion is ridiculous and offensive — and the idea it inspired racists is baseless. His media mates should engage their brains before dishing out accusations without a shred of evidence.

Why so defensive? Surely at some point in the boardroom, as yet another negative story about Sterling was published, an editor may have stepped in and thought about how it could be perceived? What responsibilities should traditionally produced 'mass media' such as newspapers have?

What do you think?

This is the 400th published post on the A-level media studies blog! Thanks everyone for your suggestions and contributions. And please, let me know if you think anything is missing! This goes for teachers and students who are not at Long Road too!

Tuesday 11 December 2018

Les Revenants mini mock - example responses



You can find below a rage of responses for a potential question that could come up in Component two section B: TV in a global age. This is an audience question, and for Les Revenants, the only audience theory we need to explore in depth in Stuart Hall's notion of audience reception and negotiation. If you want to find out what theories you need to know for each industry, make sure you check out the revision guide!

All responses were completed in half an hour by teachers or students, and are presented unedited, with only minor corrections. Please note that these should be seen officially as examples rather than exemplars. This includes the teacher responses! In some cases, the wrong names of theorists are used, theoretical terms are used incorrectly, or paragraph structure may be imprecise. However, it is important to note that exam responses are seldom 'perfect', and are written under stressful conditions. If you spot a mistake, congratulate yourself, and consider how you can avoid doing something similar!

"It is essential for a TV programme to simultaneously target both mass and specialised audiences"
Explore this statement with reference to Les Revenants


Michael's response 1


Mass audience refers to the vast and undefined audience typical to the early days of telecommunications. Initially, with only a handful of TV channels, audiences were forced to all partake in the same experiences, and as such, responses were potentially limited. However, thanks to a range of digital technologies and widening audience tastes, there has been a gravitation from traditional methods of broadcasting, to more modern methods of narrowcasting. Increasingly, producers have discovered the advantages of targeting cult, or devoted audiences. For Les Revenants, a French language supernatural/horror/zombie TV that subverts many generic paradigms, it is absolutely essential that targets a cult audience. Les Revenants expertly targets both 'casual' and 'devoted' audiences, by providing the audience with a range of polysemic readings. However, it’s ability to target a mass audience is fundamentally limited by its own insistence on using hermeneutic codes to explore it’s narrative. Les Revenants was first broadcast on the French premium TV channel Canal +, before being distributed by UK channel Chanel 4 a year later. In both instances, the show was broadcast on a weeknight at 9pm, suggesting a moderate potential for mass audience appeal.

A typical example of how Les Revenants primarily targets a cult or specialised audience is through the scene where Camille Seurat is reunited with her mother. Camille, unknown to herself and even to the audience has been dead for four years. Her entrance in to the house is marked by a generically typical diegetic ‘crash’ noise, and a typically horror film response from her mother: one of cold fear. This is anchored through a series of close up shots of her terrified face, and a slow paced exploratory montage of tracking shots of her descending the stairs. It is at this stage that the audience’s expectations of a conventional horror film are confounded. Camille nonchalantly stands in the family kitchen (stereotypically middle class, and stereotypically minimalist French chic) and informs her mother in a rapid-fire delivery of her awful day. Audiences, both specialised and potentially mainstream are forced at this point to negotiate this scene in a variety of ways. Camille’s mother, shot in low-key lighting forms a binary opposition to Camille in many ways. Her frantic, terrified facial expressions contrast with Camille’s. This is clearly not a typical horror film narrative. Audiences, especially specialised, cult audiences, may well take pleasure in the subversion of horror film conventions. Mogwai’s non-diegetic soundtrack anchors the audience’s response that this is indeed a stereotypical, conventional horror text, yet Camille is non-threatening, and lacks a range of generic paradigmatic features of the zombie genre, in that she is conventionally attractive and lacks rotting flesh or dead, vacant eyes. In this sense, Les Revenants primarily targets a specialised audience rather than a mainstream, mass audience.

Stuart Hall argues that audiences are forced in to a negotiation with the producer, and must choose whether to except or reject the preferred ideological reading. However, it is highly likely that Fabrice Gobert, the director of Les Revenants intentionally rejected the programme having one solid, preferred reading. In this sense, it can be seen that Les Revenants is highly polysemic.

A typical example of this polysemy can be found at the end of the first episode. An intertitle announces to the audience ‘four years earlier’ which instantly presents a powerful hermeneutic code. Our initial assumption that Camille was only recently dead is pleasurably subverted for both the cult target audience and the more mainstream secondary audience. However, the ending only goes on to establish more hermeneutic codes. Cross cutting between identical siblings, the 15-year-old Lena losing her virginity, and the 15-year-old Camille’s symbolic horror at her sister’s innocence being lost, a deliberately confrontational scene that divides the audience. From a British perspective, the sex scene involving two 15 year olds (despite the actor’s being 18) is taboo. Additionally, the increasingly rapid-fire cross cutting between Lena’s orgasm and Celine’s death, both illustrated through a montage of confrontational close up shots, is challenging for the audience. The final shot, a first-person bird’s eye view shot of Camille dying through impact with the ground is not a typical cliff-hanger, especially as it recalls the first shot of the first episode. The ideological perspective of the producer can be explored here, and audiences are once more forced to negotiate a difficult and challenging binary opposition between sex and death. This allegorical theme is typical of many French texts, as far ranged as Bataille’s The Story of the Eye, the popular lesbian drama Blue is the Warmest Colour, to Bunuel’s L’age d’or. However, to international audiences, a potentially oppositional response is provoked.

We have seen that Les Revenants uses a range of polysemic readings to target specialised cult audiences. This is further reinforced through the use of merchandise and viral marketing opportunities, such as Mogwai’s soundtrack CD/LP, the film tie-in book, the ‘Lake Pub’ T shirt, allowing audiences the pleasure at making reference to a hyperreal location, and the TV programme’s own enigmatic website. However, there are examples of how Les Revenants targets a wider, more mainstream secondary ‘casual audience’. This is primarily achieved through the use of intertextuality. An excellent example of this is through the character of Julie. In her late 20’s and lacking stereotypical sexualisation, Julie entertains herself through watching Tobe Hopper’s 1970’s film The Texas Chainsaw Massacre. The montage that follows is pure horror film convention. Julie is stalked by Victor, an archetypal ‘creepy child’. His status as antagonist is emphasised and further anchored through the drab mise en scene and Mogwai’s omnipresent diegetic soundtrack. As Julie looks out of her flat window, an extreme long shot demonstrates Victor’s outsider status and potentially vulnerability. These intertextual references allow the audience to take pleasure in horror film conventions, and for mass audiences to understand the product.

Ultimately, Les Revenants targets a niche, non-mainstream audience. However, it is still essential that the show has some mass audience appeal. This is primarily achieved through the utilisation of hermeneutic codes and polysemy for the cult target audience, and the frequent use of intertextuality for more mainstream mass audiences.

Michael's response 2


For most TV programmes and their producers, it is essential to strike a balance between targeting mass and specialised audiences. Mass audience simply refers to the vast and generic audience first described in the UK in relation to the early days of telecommunications broadcast. With only one channel available, the ratings share of each programme would naturally be 100%, and therefore each programme needed to have ‘mass appeal’. Lord Leith, then commissioner general for the BBC had grave doubts about this system, considering a mass communications platform an insidious way of ‘dumbing down’ the populace. However, this concept of mass audience has increasingly become less and less prevalent. Now, audiences are far more likely to be niche, and TV programmes are far more likely to narrowcast as opposed to broadcast. This allows smaller ‘cult audiences to be targeted. Les Revenants, a 2012 French supernatural horror hybrid programme, is a clear example of a show with little mass audience appeal, that instead targets a cult audience. I shall explore this notion with reference to key scenes, promotional material, and reference to the very particular and cult nature of the soundtrack.

On first glance, Les Revenants may seem like it has potential for mass appeal. For example, there are a diverse range of attractive characters of different ages, in a stunning and compelling setting. However, in practice, these elements prove to be subversive. An excellent example of Les Revenants purely targeting a cult audience is the scene where Lena Seurat, a 19-year-old barmaid, walks home Simon, an attractive and yet undead young man. Taking place in the dark and gloomy mise-en-scene of the small town. The two characters walk together in a two-shot tracking shot. From a stereotypical narrative perspective, Lena and Simon would be the ideal couple. Simon’s leather jacket and miserable personality demonstrates his misanthropic ideology, which would be a perfect match for Lena’s teen girl archetype. However, the potential romance is subverted through Simon’s deliberately obnoxious character. His performance is muted, and focused purely on his actual love, the now significantly older Adele. In a telling close up shot, Lena shouts at Simon, calling him a ‘dickhead’. This scene provides the target cult audience many opportunities to negotiate a response. Doubtless many audiences will be frustrated with Lena and Simon’s relationship, as they are denied the voyeuristic pleasure of seeing the two characters fall in love. However, other audiences may enjoy the exciting subversion of the conventions of the horror genre, as the undead Simon is atypically attractive, and shows no stereotypically inclination to murder Lena and eat her brans. In this way, we see the scene offer the audience a range of polysemic interpretations, further cementing its appeal as a cult, specialised Programme.

It’s nature as a specialised TV show can be traced back to the mode of its production. Produced for Canal +, a premium French cable channel that prides itself on prestigious, high quality productions that may not receive mass audience appeal, the show itself is a remake of an earlier supernatural film of the same name. Rather than try to soften the edges of the show, the director, Fabrice Gobert instead sought to maximise the programme’s cult appeal through employing the cult Glaswegian noise rock band Mogwai to compose and produce the show’s not diegetic soundtrack. This move is highly atypical, eschewing the orchestral soundtrack that similar TV horror shows such as The Walking Dead or Being Human have. An excellent example of how this atypically manifests itself is the scene where Victor stalks Julie back home to her flat. Hardly a stereotypical horror location, Julie instead lives in a brutalist and grey block of social housing flats. This forms a definite binary opposition between her and the middle-class Seurat family. Julie is also not hegemonically stereotypically beautiful, with her thick glasses and unflattering jumper, making her highly atypical for a horror text ‘victim’ Likewise Victor, himself a binary opposition to the fragile and troubled Julie, is a young boy. The unfamiliarity of the locations to the genre is anchored through Mogwai’s highly atypical soundtrack, which focuses on a range of atonal and un-melodic elements, including guitar clangs and subdued keyboard stabs. Mogwai’s presence offer the producers of Les Revenants a pre-existing cult audience, in that pre-existing fans of Mogwai may seek out the show due to their involvement. It also provides Les Revenants with a definite outsider status. Mogwai have no frontman, have released precisely one single, 2000’s My Father My King, a 20-minute-long instrumental jam that covers a Hebrew prayer, and is an uncommercial as they come. In fact, it is hard to ignore the notion that Les Revenants is actually being as deliberately uncommercial as possible in order to ensure a specialised audience.

This uncommercial approach of course leads to problems when it comes to distribute and market the show. Though the program offers no preferred reading, rendering Stuart Hall’s reception theory absolutely useless, it still needs to make money in order for Canal + to actually finance it. Further funding came from a variety of sources, including the French alps tourist board, offering almost 1million euros as an opportunity to promote the product. However, the ultimate example of how specialised Les Revenant’s appeal is through it’s extremely TYPICAL trailer. The international trailer for Les Revenants completely changes the tone of the show, offering audiences a fast paced montage of the whole of the eight episodes, exploring the themes of the show including supernatural romance, grief, death, love and sex. While the show drip feeds it’s cult audiences through elaborate and mysterious character arcs and an insistence on using hermeneutic codes, the trailer actually reveals a variety of mysteries from the off. It even resembles a stereotypical zombie narrative, primarily through the frequent use of Long shots of ‘the horde’ of zombies, primarily taken from the show’s eighth episode! The exciting mise en scene, rapid fire editing and cross cutting, and the selection of only the most exciting scenes serves to underline exactly how atypical the show actually is. It suggests that if an honest approach to reflecting the themes of the show was taken, it would lack an audience.

Finally, the shows insistence on covering themes of grief is omnipresent in Les Revenants. The subdued opening shot of Camille’s bus careering off a cliff face in a static, unflinching longshot forms a direct binary opposition to the severity of the incident. Audiences are instantly left without a way of negotiating the scene, and are force to accept from the initial enigmatic shot that the show not only lacks a preferred reading, but also seeks to polarise its audience through deliberately upsetting imagery.

To conclude, Les Revenants solely targets a cult audience. Though some promotional material may hint at mass appeal, the show itself uses enigmatic hermeneutic codes, confounds audience expectations, makes reference to already cult bands and features upsetting themes of grief and desperation. Therefore it……………………………………….

I didn't finish in time :( 

Student 1


Les Revenants subverts this statement by only targeting a specialised cult audience through polysemic readings in relation to Stuart Hall's Reception Theory. However, Les Revenants subverts a lot of his readings as well. Les Revenant was first aired in 2012 on Canal+ in France, and was broadcasted to channel 4 a year late (in 2013) for the UK. All music is composed by a Glaswegian band called Mogwai (post-rock genre).

On the one hand, Les Revenants has a Horror, Cult genre meaning it has a very specialised audience who most likely watch horror movies and a lot are devoted fans to the show. The show targets this specialised audiences with use of intertextuality of other horror genres - Stuart Halls Reception theory. For example, in the scene of Julie watching a movie the room has a low key lighting whilst Julie has confined herself on the sofa creating a spooky lexis to the scene, this suggests she is watching horror genre. The mise-en-scene of chainsaw sound effects and flashing lighting from the tv in the background of the movie is intertextual and directly references the horror movie 'Chainsaw Massacre'.
Les Revenants specialised audience would likely understand the intertextuality due to there love of horror genre, this could possibly be a preferred reading that Les Revenants wants its audience to understand. However, another preferred reading could be that the show wants its audience to be frustrated by not knowing what the film is, meaning that Les Revenants actually subverts polysemic readings by having an unknown preferred reading; this effect is conveyed though the use of a mid-shot from an angles where the tv screen cannot be clearly seen so that the audience can only understand the reference by mise-en-scene of sound.

On the other hand, Les Revenants does not have a mass audience as the movie is fairly slow paced and requires a lot of interest to understand how it subverts stereotypical horror-zombie sub-genre conventions. For example, the show only uses indirect mise-en-scene to convey connotations of death like constant low-key lighting. In the scene where Simon goes to see Adele, Simon is wearing a black suit whilst Adele is wearing a white dress, this creates a binary opposition that symbolises life and death (as Simon has come from the dead) - in which a casual audience may not understand into depth unlike it's cult audience.

However, Les Revenants has an international audience from English/Scottish areas. The band Mogwai has their own cult audience around England and Scotland, these audience have been linked to Les Revenants due to there synergy and how the band music reflects the slow and deep themes of the show. Because of this, Les Revenants has a much larger specialised audience that are mostly not in France and have a whole other cult audience through Mogwai.

In conclusion, Les Revenants highly subverts the statement due to its vast amounts of intertextuality and many referential codes (Stuart Hall) that only cult audience and horror fans would understand to the full extent of its detail within the show. The lack of polysemic readings in the show also makes it harder for casual audiences to watch, as they have to produce their own ideologies to the show creating a confusing plot and slow pace to understanding the show.

Student 2


I agree it is essential for a TV programme to simultaneously target both mass and specialised audiences. The term 'Mass Audience' came from the mass broadcasting on television in the early days of its creation. With only a few available television channels, the content had to appeal to a wide range of people and include different ways for this wide range of people to connect with the content. Now that narrow broadcasting is a thing of the past with more TV channels, online streaming services (e.g. Netflix) and piracy existing, there has been space for more specialised audience shows to be made. These are often referred to as 'cult' shows with an intense following behind it and fans who engage with the show in more ways than just watching it, for example, fan-fictions, fan art, 'shipping' pairs of characters together (imagining them in relationships), creating extensive Wikipedia pages, and more.

It is often beneficial for shows to establish a cult audience as it means they have a group of people who will always come back for more and engage heavily with the product being created with more incentive to support it, but it also means that this audience may be small, meaning less people watch the show. This is a good reason to combine appealing to mass audiences and specialised audiences. You will be able to get lots of people watching as well as having a group who go the extra mile to engage with it. Canal+ is the producer and distributor of Les Revenants. They have an ideology similar to that of the UK 'Channel 4' where they want to be subversive and play a variety of different shows challenging the norm of TV. This is the reason Canal+ decided to take on Les Revenants, its ability to break paradigms and create mystery.

Les Revenants is a subversive, polysemic show because it falls into a range of different genres. It could be described as a Supernatural Zombie French Drama show and that probably wouldn't even cover the litany of sub-genres it also falls into. There are many places which these genres can be scene interacting with each other and creating multiple readings for the audience to discover.

In the scene where Camille's mother first sees her there are many conflicting representations we can see. Using Stuart Hall's reception theory we can figure out the different audience reactions to the scene and how this caters for both a cult and mass audience.

The scene starts with slow, droning non-diegetic soundtrack instantly creating a sinister atmosphere. This is immediately contrapuntal to the scene in which a mother is seeing her dead daughter and the preferred reading here is to create a feeling of tension in the audience by off-balancing them with this soundtrack. The shots of the scene show over the shoulder shot reverse shots of Camille and her mother in which the mother walks slowly towards her. This not only gives connotations of approaching a dangerous animal, but also adds to this contrapuntal reading of the scene by confusing the audience with this separation of mother and daughter. The mother is framed with low key lighting in which we can barely see her face. This effect was most likely done in post-production colour grading to create a paradigm of the horror genre. Camille is framed with high key lighting creating a binary opposition between them, the living and the dead.

In this scene the audience is given lots of different readings. The preferred is that Camille is dead and the mother is scared but a negotiated reading may be that the mother is going mad, or even that Camille is the evil antagonist through her anchorage with the music but juxtaposition with the high key lighting. It is almost made intentionally to confuse the audience and give them lots of ideas through Roland Barthes symbolic and hermeneutic codes. This intentional confusion of representations in this scene appeals to all of Les Revenants genres. Supernatural through use of lighting and sound, family drama through the conversation of a mother and her child, zombie through Camille coming back from the dead, and French through the setting (the alps) and lexis used.

While some audience members may be annoyed by this confusing representation, many will find something they are invested in.

One specific example of Les Revenants seeking a specialised audience is their use of the band MOGWAI to create their soundtrack, later released in album form 'Les Revenants'. MOGWAI is a 'Post-rock' band from Glasgow, Scotland. They have a slow, reflective and mood driven sound which is subversive of their genre.

Student 3


Although Les Revenants is a cult followed show mostly, in which they use such actions as using a subversive but also cult followed band Mogwai in order to target a more niche audience, the way in which the show encodes grief also demonstrates the way in which it is essential to also target mass audiences, that way combating any ideas of preferred reading. Stuart Hall's reception theory gave the idea that every product would have a preferred, oppositional and negotiated reading with every consumption of a media product. However, to target both cult and mass audience, Les Revenant deliberately doesn't follow this pattern to show the differences in readings of grief and the way in which people deal with it.

In one pivotal scene, there are a group of people at what we assume is a meeting, a place where in which people who have lost someone meet and discuss how they are or are not coping. The dark costume of all the characters reflects the atmosphere, accompanied by a low key lighting that made it clear that this was not a happy environment. the mise en scene shows us a bare room with only chairs and the people sat in them. However, when the father of Camille receives a phone call, there is a shot reverse shot of the mother telling him to come over, surprising the father as he leaves the bland and miserable setting of the room in order to foreshadow how he won't need that grief meeting as his child has returned.

This shows that although the show relies on a cult audience to understand the complexities of the zombie aspects as well as the other supernatural relationships, that the allegory of the zombies is of grief and how different people deals with it, something that a mass audience can relate to if only at a bare understanding of the concept. What this shows about the lack of preferred reading is that because everybody reacts to grief and the idea of the return of a loved one differently, there is not a possible idea of what a preferred reading would be as the fundamental theme reflects something that doesn't have a 'preferred' method or a natural way to react. For example, the mass audience may see a man who's struggling to deal with the death of his child and sympathise but also somebody may believe him to be a rude and selfish man who is reacting to other member's grief with spite. This lack of relation to Stuart Hall's theory shows that it subverts classical presentation of media and helps form a cult audience that can appreiocate the complexities of the show that a mass audience couldn't through ideologies.

In another key scene, when Camille's mother goes to the bathroom and Camille asks her for a towel, the disconnect between her and her daughter is not only symbolic but also presented through the shut door. The mother waits outside, and when Camille opens the door she reacts in shock as if she had just seen a zombie, which fundamentally she is. When she goes to get her a towel, the mother runs away in panic, but not in the conventional way but only to hide the grief she once had for her daughter. Instead of questioning it, she instead hides the memorial and the idea that her daughter has passed away. A mass audience may see a woman who is hiding her death and is trying to just accept her back and is struggling to react, however a more niche audience may believe that the use of the entrapment of the small hall way the mother stumbles towards symbolises the suffocation she feels as she's all alone with someone she hasn't seen in 4 years and the tracking shot not entering the room demonstrates that she has secluded this room to a memory that has now repaired.

Using the allegory that the zombies or 'the returned' is a true example of how people deal with grief differently and how the idea of family members coming back would affect the grief that remains there forever creates the idea that although targeting a niche audience is an essential element to present an intellectual reading but also creating an obvious display of human emotion, an emotion that every person experiences intrigues mass audiences that help subvert the classic perceptions of what preferred readings are.

Student 4


Targeting refers to how a media product attracts audiences to consume the media product. A mass audience is an audience that reaches a wide range of people, whereas a specialised audience is a audience targeted by the media production. This can be done though stereotypical paradigmatic features of the genre. I will argue that Les Revenants targets both mass and specialised audiences by deploying a range of polysemic readings. Les Revenants is a postmodern hyperreal supernatural drama television series, directed by Frabrice Gobert in France. It debuted on 26th November 2012 on Canal. It’s international distributer is Universal studios and debuted on 9 June 2013 on Channel 4. The soundtrack is produced by Mogwai, a "post rock" Scottish band, which was selected for their cult following and ideology, which breaks stereotypical paradigmatic features of a boy band. They produce contrapuntal music throughout the episode for polysemic audience responses.

The scene denoting Camille’s return presents polysemic readings for audiences, the low-key lighting and non-diegetic contrapuntal soundtrack is a paradigmatic feature of the horror genre. The shot reverse shot presents with the mise-en-scene presents a binary opposition of fear and calm with the facial expressions contrasted between the mother and Camille This presents several negotiated readings for the audience for instance, Liking the scene due to the suspect or disliking the scene due to how the mother is reacting to her daughter. This is useful for targeting mass and specialised audiences because of the hermeneutic codes it produces which can engage audiences in fandoms.

The scene between Simon, Lina and Adele also presents polysemic readings through the intertextual horror mise-en-scene. The close up of Adele looking into the mirror with Simon being blurry, due to the depth of field, and then disappearing. The intertextuality of Simon trying to break in with Adele crying. And the symbolism of their clothing referencing marriage and the binary opposition of life vs death portrayed by Simon being dead. The scene displays an enigma code for the audience to understand what has happened in their relationship which helps in creating negotiated readings for the audience to discuss. The fandom also might start “shipping” either Lina and Simon or Adele and Simon which can appeal to a cult audience.

Another scene is when Victor stalks Julie the low-key lighting and non-diegetic soundtrack creates an eerie setting, And the intertextuality of having a ghost child is suspenseful to the audience. A negotiated reading of this scene is that the audience hates it because it’s inconsistent as Julie surely must have seen Victor throughout the sequence. Another negotiated reading is that the scene is good due to the suspense created by the paradigmatic features of horror. As a whole one could question the effectiveness of Stuart Halls reception theory because the producer has not presented a clear ideology within Les Revenants and therefore takes out the possibility of having a preferred and oppositional reading.

In conclusion

Student 5


Les Revenants targets casual watchers and a cult audience through it's use of polysemic readings in relation to Stuart Hall's Reception Theory. However it can be argued that due to the many audience responses that Les Revenants may evoke, there are not many preferred readings which is subversive in terms of Les Revenants because the producer doesn't seem to have one specific ideology. This is why it is essential for media products to target mass audiences and specialised audiences because if one audience doesn't respond to the media product in a specific way others will. For example, Les Revenants was given a large sum of money to promote the French alps within the media but actually creates many oppositional readings to the producer's ideologies due to the nature of the show.

It is essential for both types of audiences to be targeted by media products because it allows different audiences to come up with different readings based on their prior knowledge or their own ideologies. An example of this is the non-diegetic sound in the shot that uses the 180 Degree rule  as a contrast between Camille's mum and Camille's feelings within the scene. The soundtrack may attract fans of the Glaswegian band 'Mogwai' which means that they may have a negotiated reading of the scene itself due to them being able to recognise the sound but feeling uneasy about Camille's sudden reappearance. This unease is also reinforced by the binary opposition of the mise-en-scene of lowkey lighting where Camille's mum is standing and the highkey lighting where Camille is standing. This may create a oppositional response by an audience as at this point in the episode, the audience is likely to be confused about the zombie sub-genre convention of coming back from the dead due to it being done in a subversive way.

Another reason it is essential for both types of audiences to be targeted within a media product is to get more people to watch it. This is evident with the intertextual reference to the Texas Chainsaw Massacre film which conforms to the stereotypical paradigmatic features of a horror film. This scene may appeal to an audience of horror fans due to the intertextual link to a horror film but may also appeal to a wider audience of families in general due to the mise-en-scene of the sofa in front of the TV. This may create a negotiated reading due to the audience being confused about the genre that is being established by this pilot episode but may also recognise the familiar sight of a sofa in front of a TV which is common in most family living rooms. The use of a high angle mid-shot for this scene may also create an oppositional reading due to the connotations of power that a high angle shot gives the audience viewing the product.

Overall, because Les Revenants seems to lack one specific producer ideology, it has many polysemic readings which are essential for a media product to appeal to a wide range of audiences. In relation to Stuart Hall's reception theory, many different audiences may react to different scenes in this pilot episode in different ways which creates many different audience responses due to the polysemic readings that can be identified within certain scenes. The lack of evident producer ideologies are what allows both cult and casual audiences to watch the show and enjoy it and due to the use of many different camera angles combined with mise-en-scene, it could create readings which may be negotiated online in on places like Reddit which could allow users to combine their own ideologies about the show to form their own identities which relates to David gauntlet's theories of identity which is essential for a producer to create a product that appeals to a specific audience. however in the case of Les Revenants, the producer has allowed the audience to create the ideology of the show which leaves no evident preferred reading for this show which makes it subversive.

Student 6


I agree that it is essential for a TV programme to simultaneously target both mass and specialised audiences. A specialised audience is someone who is a fan of the show. They are active and don't just watch the show and then get on with their lives. Specialised audiences create fan theories, talk about the show and buy merchandise. A mass audience is everyone else, the ones who watch the show and then carry on with their lives, they don't become obsessed with it like a cult/ specialised audience. Les Revenants is a thriller/supernatural French drama produced by Canal+ and broadcasted by channel 4 that targets both mass and specialised audiences by providing them with polysemic narratives.

One scene that has multiple meanings and responses is the reunion scene. Towards the beginning of the show Camille returns home and proceeds to make a sandwich, be gobby towards her mother and then leave the kitchen in a mess. Camille then goes upstairs for a shower and Claire follows her up the stairs. According to Stuart Hall every media product has three types of readings; preferred, negotiated and oppositional. A preferred reading is the reading the producer wanted the audience to have whilst and oppositional reading is when the audience completely disagrees with the producers ideologies. Many times audience members are somewhere in between these, this is a negotiated reading. I believe the preferred reading for this scene is confusion. A specialised audience are left feeling confused by the close ups of Claire's face as she goes up the stairs and the use of creepy non-diegetic sound. It creates confusion because we are unsure as to why she is reacting like this, she is scared and apprehensive of her own daughter. This makes the cult audience want to talk about it with other fans and post about it on social media and in online forums. I believe that the mass audience wont be confused by this scene but will feel sorry for Camille. Her mother is acting scared of her rather than going up and hugging her because she was presumed dead. This audience feels sorry for Camille but not enough for it to stay with them after the show has finished. Their emotions are not powerful enough to cause them to want to talk about it or post in forums. They are also not going to create fan theories over this scene whilst the specialised cult audience would.

Another way Les Revenants targets a specialised audience is through things outside the show. Online forums have been created for fans to talk about their ideas, concerns and confusion with others. Merchandise has been made of things from the show e.g a shirt that has the Lake pub on it. This allows audiences to show their love for the show, which may prompt conversations and even people deciding to watch the show after these conversations. However people who don't watch the show aren't likely to know of the Lake Pub and therefore a shirt with this on will make the cult audience feel part of something that is secret or like a club. Merchandise is a good way of the producers target cult because not only does it grown their audience it also allows them to get more revenue because they are selling things. Money is the primary goal of all media products.

A final way that Les Revenants targets a specialised audience is by conforming and subverting the horror and supernatural genre conventions. This is a zombie show, but from the first episode the mise-en-scene of makeup and costumes reveals nothing to the audience regarding who the zombies are. In most other zombie shows we can tell straight away who the zombies are because they look dead and stand out from the rest. However in Les Revenants both dead and alive look the same. This is going to provide the cult audience to create theories about who is dead, talk about it and become an active audience. When Camille is in the shower and the mother is walking up the stairs it makes use of non-diegetic music by Mogwai in order to make the audience feel apprehensive about what is going on and why the mother is so scared of her own daughter. This is a hermeneutic code because it creates suspense.

Les Revenants has allegorical aspects in the form of immigration. The dead have returned but are not welcomed very nicely and people are apprehensive and scared of them. This could be seen as relating to the people who are immigrating to our country, they are not welcomed at first by some and a vast amount of people are apprehensive about them being in this country. This could allow for a cult audience because it gives them something to relate to but also gives them yet another thing to talk about.

In conclusion I agree that TV programmes should target mass and specialised audiences simultaneously in order to ensure a big audience and to maximise profits. However I think that Les Revenants focuses more on targeting a mass audience because it is a supernatural TV show and fans want to talk about it and they get involved in it more than a show like Eastenders where viewers don't create theories, go to conventions or buy merchandise. It also provides the producers with more profit which is the primary goal for any media product.

Student 7


In the modern world, TV isn't just about sitting down in front of the screen, picking a channel and watching a show whenever it is scheduled. Due to streaming services and the internet, people are now much more able to pick and choose what they would like to watch and when they want to watch it. This makes it more essential than ever for TV shows to target such a large audience as they need to stand out from a much more diverse range than previously.

What is interesting about 'Les Revenants' is the outstanding genre hybridity it uses to create something that appeals to so many. The show is clearly a drama series, as from the start we see a Camille, a panicked young girl, walking the streets alone. As the camera angles cut between close up and tracking shots, the hermeneutic code creates quite a dramatic atmosphere, as the audience will want to know where Camille is going, why she looks so panicked and why she is out late in the evening. As well as this key scene, there are also other dramatic shots such as the bus crash and the suicide of mr Costa.

Another aspect of the show is the horror and supernatural side, which you could say is the dominant reading of the show, as it is based from ghosts and also frequently uses generic conventions of the horror genre. For example, we see a young boy (Victor) following Julie from a bus stop. This convention of a young child 'haunting' people can be seen in many films such as Insidious and the  silent twins in The Shining. Victor's character archetype is much like these, in that he is young, pale and acts in a strange way. This displays the producer's ideology of 'The Returned' people as he is the most stereotypical of them all. What subverts this, however, is Julie's unconventional reaction to Victor when she finally notices him. Although close up shots are used on Victor's face and eyes which may make the audience uncomfortable, Julie seems calm and even invites him into her own home. Her lack of fear is interesting, and by breaking convention it creates something which is much more individual to other programmes.

Using Stuart Hall's reception theory, we can gauge that this show isn't designed to have a preferred reading. Sure, a dominant ideology is displayed as we can clearly tell that the show is based on a mystery of the returned people, however the way that this mystery is portrayed doesn't fit into one genre. This means it is highly polysemic, and the frequent use of hermeneutic codes means that the audience doesn't know much and therefore must make up their own minds as the series progresses.

However, it is not only the genre of this show that makes it interesting and appeal to wider audiences. A more specialised audience that it may target is the band 'Mogwai', who produced and wrote the soundtrack used within 'Les Revenants'. What is interesting about them is that they aren't French like the show, but they are from Glasgow, and the music they create is quite niche - it is wholly instrumental, unlike most music. This makes their fans a specialised audience, and enables the show to target another audience which they may not have if the music hadn't been used, as well as giving it international appeal outside of France. It is also another item which fans of the show may use in order to create more of an immersive experience and connect with it better, and therefore by using vertical integration the producers have enabled themselves to have a much wider audience.

Overall, TV shows nowadays need to simultaneously target both mass audiences and specialised audiences as they have a lot more competition now that channels didn't face ten or twenty years ago as streaming didn't exist. By using several genres, they are able to target multiple audiences, as well as using 'Mogwai' in order to create more international appeal.

Newspaper mini mock - example responses



Find below a range of responses for questions relating to component one section a, and component one section b.

All responses were completed in half an hour by teachers or students, and are presented unedited, with only minor corrections. Please note that these should be seen officially as examples rather than exemplars. This includes the teacher responses! In some cases, the wrong names of theorists are used, theoretical terms are used incorrectly, or paragraph structure may be imprecise. However, it is important to note that exam responses are seldom 'perfect', and are written under stressful conditions. If you spot a mistake, congratulate yourself, and consider how you can avoid doing something similar!

Please also consider: all responses here have been completed by first year media students who have not even finished their first full term. Therefore, there is going to be significant potential for improvement, and rightly so!

In what ways can newspapers incorporate viewpoints and ideologies for their audiences?

IMPORTANT! - Please note: this question would probably appear in component one section a, where you would be prompted to discuss the front covers of The Mirror and The Times as set by the exam board. However, for the purposes of this activity, we have suggested a focus on audience theory more appropriate to component one section b. Please make sure to read the question in the final exam!


Michael's response 1


British newspapers incorporate a wide variety of ideological perspectives to their audiences to a wide variety of reasons. This may be for the purpose of constructing target audiences, the process of narrativisation, and potentially for the purpose of manipulating the ideology of the audience. In each case, ideological perspectives are encoded through a range of media language. In order to explore this aspect of ideological dissemination, I shall be drawing on the examples of The Daily Mirror, The Times, an a few other subsidiary examples. I shall conclude that ultimately, ideological perspectives are encoded for the express purpose of targeting and manipulating audiences.

The Daily Mirror, published by Reach PLC is an established British tabloid newspaper with a distinct left-wing perspective, and, as is typical of tabloids, a target working class audience. An excellent example of how The Mirror incorporates it’s ideologies is a full page article discussing the death of a one year old boy in North London. The headline, ‘man held after toddler dies in hammer attack’ is emotive and potentially manipulative of the audience. The lexis of ‘toddler’ in particular uses colloquial language to present an emotional and affecting narrative for the audience. Likewise, the lexis of ‘hammer attack’ which is anchored by the sheer size of the typeface, creates a brutal and violent image. The dominant ideology here is that the father is guilty, and the murder weapon is a hammer. It is worth noting at this point that none of these facts are actually substantiated or indeed verifiable at this stage. However, the selection and placement of the main and subsidiary images (a close up of a sad toddler’s face, a grainy shot of a hammer, a two-shot of a couple and a wide angled establishing shot of a quiet London suburb) create an intense narrative for the working class target audience. The size of the pictures reinforce the Mirror’s working class target audience, and cultivate an ideological perspective that working class people are better suited to looking at large pictures that riding involved and descriptive text.

Within the main body of text, presented as a single narrow column at the bottom right of the images, two ‘sources’ are presented, a passer-by named only as ‘gui-gui’ and a ‘close friend’ of the accused’s wife. Both of these responses allow the journalist to rely on supposition and conjecture as opposed to hard facts. In these instances, the ideological perspective of the paper is clear, that lurid, revolting and manipulative stories can be crafted from tragic real life events. A common maxim of the newspaper industry is ‘if it bleeds, it leads’. It is clear through its position in the montage of images and the vast headline that the mise-en-scene of the hammer is the most important aspect of this story, demonstrating the newspaper’s lack of concern at scandalising and narrativisng an actual, tragic and undefined event.

On first glance, the corresponding article in The Times, reporting on the same instance seems to take a more measured approach. The article, appearing on page seven features a more matter-of-fact lexis in its smaller headline: ‘man held after baby dies in ‘attack on twins’. This less sensationalist approach is typical of a broadsheet newspaper like The Times, and it demonstrates a more middle class ideological perspective to an intended middle class, middle aged target audience. The formal mode of address also infers a higher level of education in the target audience, cultivating an ideological perspective in the audience that education is important. The Times Article lacks the excessive anchorage of The Mirror, featuring only a small, understated main image, a low angled shot of a police officer knocking on the door of an archetypal London town house. This presents a very definite ideological viewpoint to the middle class audience: that this story is exceptional because of the middle class area that the event has happened in.

However, he most interesting, and perhaps the most revolting aspect of the Times ideological perspective is encoded through its distinct ethnocentric bias through the inclusion of the ethnicity of the accused. Referring to him as Indian, and his wife as Romanian, the Times presents two aspects that a purely circumstantial and not related to the case in hand. However, this according the George Gerbner is a way of cultivating the ideology that ethnic minority individuals are far more likely to commit crimes. This example of ethnic stereotyping should be avoided b newspapers, which should only comment on ethnicity if it is related to the case at hand. However, The Times clearly wishes to encode the dominant ideological perspective that ethnicity and crime are related. This in turn helps the Times to target it’s middle class, affluent and right wing audience, by presenting them with ideogical perspectives they already agree with.

Another excellent example of how newspapers can incorporate ideological perspectives is the Mail Online’s popular ‘sidebar of shame’. This selection of broadly human interest stories generally tends to represent women as hegemonically insuperior to men, and largely present purely for the purpose of being looked at by heterosexual men. One such example of this hegemonic patriarchal ideology was published Thursday 6th December, in an article entitled ‘Love Island's Montana Brown flashes some sideboob in a risqué blue and white stripe swimsuit as she hits the beach in Dubai’. A series of mid shots, clearly taken incognito with a telephoto lens, demonstrate a young, hegemonically stereotypically attractive reality star in a tight fitting swimsuit. There are over 20 images in total of this, plus an opportunity for the intended heterosexual working class female target audience to buy said swimsuit. Furthermore, the anchorage of the caption ‘Montana Brown displayed her incredible physique’ suggests to the audience that the person is doing so through her own volition, and that she is complicit in the act of showing herself, when she is clearly unaware that this is the case. This reinforces through cultivation the dominant hegemonic ideological perspective that women are purely there to be looked at by heterosexual men, and, in the case of The Mail Online, to be idolised, critiqued and emulated by heterosexual women in order to fit in t patriarchal hegemonic standard.

To conclude, it is essential that newspapers present clear ideological perspectives to their audiences. However in doing so, they invariably manipulate the ideology of their target audience, for the sole purpose of profit and power.

Michael's response 2


The producers of newspapers typically incorporate a range of ideological perspectives when creating newspapers. This is for several reasons, including commercial, ideological, and audience related. Ideology itself refers to the beliefs and viewpoints of the producer. Through media language, audiences are invited to explore and negotiate a range of responses. However, typically producers will attempt to anchor these Reponses through techniques such as captioning. In order to explore how newspapers incorporate viewpoints and ideologies, I shall be exploring the examples of The Daily Mirror, a British tabloid newspaper catering to a working class left wing audience, and the Times, a broadsheet targeting a middle class, right wing audience. I shall also be supplementing these examples with material from The Mail Online, a particularly popular online branch of the right-wing Daily Mail that primarily targets a working-class female audience.

The front cover of The Daily Mirror on the day of Trump’s election as president of the USA is explicit in its ideological perspective. The Daily Mirror is left wing, and therefore it clearly would be opposed to Trump’s extreme right wing political leanings. This is anchored in many ways on the front cover. The main image, a heavily manipulated image of the statue of liberty clutching her face, demonstrates the clear ideology that Trump’s election is resolutely awful. The statue of Liberty functions as not only a symbolic code and metonym of America and freedom, but it also functions as a powerful referential code for the target audience. Her gesture demonstrates that not only the Daily Mirror, but also by extension America is opposed to Trump’s victory. This ideological perspective is further anchored an reinforced by the bold, san-serif headline that simply states ‘what have they done’? This functions as a direct mode of address to the audience, and also further targets the target British audience by creating a clear distinction between us (Britain) and ‘them’ (America). The ideological perspective is further anchored through a range of aspects of intertextuality. The weeping statue is a direct intertextual reference to Dr Who’s ‘weeping Angel’ antagonist, a fact that British audiences especially working class British audiences would easily be able to identify. Further elements of intertextuality include the plumes of black smoke in the background of the central image, a referential code to the generic conventions of the disaster film genre. Ultimately the front cover of The Mirror demonstrates a blunt and politically biased ideological perspective to it’s mainly left wing audience. The shocking and even scandalous nature of this cover allows the paper to attract its target audience, and therefore ensure that the edition will have a wider circulation.

The front cover of The Times, on the other hand, demonstrates an initially oppositional ideological viewpoint. A midshot double page splash wrap-around cover, saved only for the very most notable events adorns this edition. Trump gestures passively with his fist, eyes to the right of the camera, in front of the background of an American flag. The flag has clear connotations for the right wing target audience: of patriotism and of freedom and of victory. The headline, The New World is presented in a serif font, offering a sophisticated mode of address to the target middle class audience. However, the Times Does not openly ideogically support Trump in the same way that The Mirror opposes him. In an example of bias through selection, an image of Trump looking either smug or lost, depending on the negotiation of the audience is selected. His fist has symbolic connotations of power, but also functions as a proairetic code, suggesting violence ahead. This is further anchored to the sophisticated target audience through the lexis of the subheading demonstrating that Trump will send “shockwaves around the globe”. The negative connotations of shockwave make intertextual reference to the disaster genre once more. However, the dominant reading is hard for the audience to deduce. The Times neither endorses nor rejects Trump’s ideology. Even the pull quote on the back cover, with its repeated use of you will be so proud” can by polysemically interpreted by the target audience.

It is rare however that a newspaper will like a preferred reading, and instead will attempt to anchor the audience as much as possible. Beyond political ideological perspectives, newspapers will also typically present hegemonic ideological perspectives through representations of gender also. An excellent example of this can be found on the Mail Online’s ‘don’t miss’ column on Friday 7th December. This column frequently presents hegemonically attractive images of women in a state of undress to the heterosexual female audience to judge, with the express ideogical intention that they are aspirational. The article, headlined “Jennifer Aniston goes braless on ELLE cover shoot as she says 'science and miracles' could help her have children and insists two marriages HAVE been successful” emphasises the stereotypically attractive Anniston through a series of mid shots, emphasising her body. This emphasis is anchored through the lexis of the copy, suggesting that ‘Jen [has] defiantly [gone] braless beneath a semi-sheer white vest top. This is an example of sexualisation, where an individual, in this case a woman is represented solely through her sexual characteristics. This cultivates a hegemonically narrow ideology in the target audience, and symbolically suggests that only one body type, typically slender and white, is appropriate for women to have. By repeating almost identical stories every day. The Mail Online not only cultivates this ideology to manipulate its target audience, but to sell the product to its target audience through scandal and through sexualisation. This representation ultimately limits the ways in which women are represented in media to one that is typically sexualised and objectified, a clear example of Berger’s assertion that ‘men act, women appear’

We have seen several examples of how newspapers cultivate ideological approaches through media language. This is primarily for financial reasons, as well as ideological. By presenting a clearly anchored representation of a political figure or a well-known actor, newspapers are able to present these straightforward ideologies to vast audiences, who in turn faithful by the product and click through to advertisements day after day.

Student 1


There are many different ways in which Newspapers can incorporate ideologies. For example when reporting on stories producers will convey a dominant ideology within their media product. For example in the Daily Mirror's cover on Donald Trumps presidency they conveyed Left wing political ideologies, this was done through the mise-en-scene of the statue of liberty holding her head in her hands. The statue of liberty symbolises freedom and america's freedom, here the daily mirror may be trying to suggest that America is trapped with Donald Trump incorporating their ideology of anti-trump and his beliefs. Furthermore, the daily mirror have incorporated this ideology with a dark and miserable mise-en-scene. This could act here as a symbolic code for danger and coruptness. It also presents ideas of destruction and incorporates a post-apocalyptic genre convention, this conveys to us as an audience that America's government is in a state of unbalanced equilibrium furthermore encoding the producers political ideology towards Trump. Another way Newspaper's can incorporate ideologies is through lexis and font. in the daily mirror the lexis of 'What have they done?' acts as a direct mode of address as it questioning the audience and almost makes them reflect upon themselves as if they have done something wrong, the mise-en-scene of the red bold font also has connotations of hell and danger this further portrays the bias of anti-Trump.

Furthermore, producers can convey ideologies in media products through format and layout. For example, in The Times cover of Donald Trumps presidency we can see a layout that it is very image based containing very little lexis, the only lexis within the product is 'The New World' this could represent that Trump has reinvented a new 'greater' america, this is an example of anchorage within a media product as the producer has fixed the particular meaning into the product through the use of simple lexis.The mise-en-scene of the serif font also has connotations of positivity and conveys an ideology that Trump will have a positive impact on America. We could relate these conventions to Stuart Hall's decoding model as here the producer has encoded a positive ideology and we as an audience have decoded this and interpreted it in a positive and hopeful way due to mise-en-scene,lexis and layout. However, in media products although strong and dominant ideologies may be incorporated it is possible for audiences to deduce polysemic readings. For example in The Times they have included a very smug picture of Donald Trump one reading of this could be that audiences are slightly wary for the future this could be bias through selection as it could suggest Trump is unprepared. On the other hand, it connotes confidence and reassures the audience that Trump is a strong and confident leader.

Student 2


Newspapers incorporate viewpoints and ideologies by the mise-en-scene, an example of this is in the Daily Mirror newspaper from when Donald Trump was elected as president. Mise-en-scene played an important role in incorporating viewpoints and ideologies due to the Statue of Liberty having connotations of freedom and almost even representing America, yet the mise-en-scene is that the statue has her hands in her head as if she is disappointed. This anchors the audience to believe that Donald Trump being elected as President is disappointing. Another way that mise-en-scene is used in this newspaper is through the smoke and war-like images behind the statue. This anchors the audience to believe that Donald Trump is as bad as war and will perhaps even bring war. The dark cloud is a proairetic code, perhaps enforcing how Trump will bring war. Mise-en-scene is also used in The Times newspaper, also from when Donald Trump was elected as president. The Times used mise-en-scene of an American flag in the background to symbolise freedom, this anchors the audience to believe that Trump will bring freedom and justice to America. 

Newspapers incorporate viewpoints and ideologies by the lexis and headlines they use. An example of this is in the Daily Mirror newspaper which was previously mentioned. This newspaper uses a lexis of "What have they done?" This rhetorical question lexis sounds as if the rest of the world is sighing at America. This newspaper also has the heading "It's President Trump" in the colour red which could signify danger and violence. In The Times newspaper mentioned above, there is lexis of "shockwaves" which could perhaps symbolise natural disasters. This could lead to the audience negotiating a negative view on President Trump. The headline of "The New World" is chosen for this newspaper. It is presented in a serif font which has connotations of positivity and could be seen as serious, as if Trump will be a global force for good. The placement of the headline is directly over Trump's heart which could demonstrate his love and intentions to shape the world. this shows an ideology that The Times believe Trump will do good for America and genuinely cares about the country, and has good intentions. The audience will read this newspaper and negotiate whether they agree or disagree. 

Newspapers incorporate viewpoints and ideologies by the images they use. An example of this is in The Mirror newspaper from when a baby was murdered in Finsbury Park. In this newspaper, the images took up the majority of the page, there is a bigger focus on images which means there is less room for writing, perhaps showing how the target audience may be a lower class. There is also an image of a hammer which the newspaper is assuming to have been used in the murder however this was not confirmed. This creates the viewpoint that this newspaper is aimed at a lower class as stereotypically they may be interested in the hammer, and may not want to read as much writing. The image of supposedly the place where the baby was killed is included, and in this image is a police car. This could show an ideology that lower class people are more interested in crime due to the police car having connotations of crime and the newspaper including this image. 

Student 3


One way newspapers can incorporate viewpoints and ideologies is through the lexis they use For example emotive and colloquial language can be used to wither create a personal or informal effect. For example in the BBC news regarding a murder of a child the term "toddler is used. This is emotive language and positions the audience to feel closer to the child almost is the mothers point of view. The full sentence is "Finsbury park toddler death" After reading the article about a child being murdered the emotive language is effective as the world "toddler" conveys a very innocent tone but yet not a baby and suggests that they are old enough to know whats going on in the world therefore this conveys the producers ideology of that the murderer was a evil and diabolical man and that the whole case is very emotional and unjust.

Another way newspapers can incorporate viewpoints and ideologies is through anchorage. Anchorage is the process of fixing a particular meaning to a media text. This helps conveys the producers ideology of the topic and can often be very biased. An example of two newspapers anchoring specific ideologies are the two right and left wing newspapers: The Morning Star and The Sun. On the front page of The Morning Star the head line read "its got to be labour" in a bold typeface with a picture of Jeremy Corbyn with his thumbs up below. This anchors the idea that labour is the only way forward suggesting Corbyn has good ideas. The mise-en-scene of his thumbs up conveys a positive ideology of him anchoring the viewpoint that he is a good party. The use of the bold and large typeface suggests that the text is important and should not be missed, overall this conveys the producers ideology that The Morning Star is biased towards left wing politics and anchors the idea that we should vote for labour. On the other hand The sun is the opposite. On the front page of the sun it read "don't chuck Britain in the cor-bin" with an edited picture of Corbyn in the bun surrounded by rubbish. The mise-en-scene of the rubbish conveys a unprofessional and dirty representation of Corbyn suggesting that perhaps he is a "trash" politician this assumption is further supported by the pun "cor-bin". Overall this newspaper conveys the producers ideology that The Sun is biased towards right wing politics furthermore anchoring the audience to not vote for labour.

Moreover, another way newspapers incorporate viewpoints and ideologies is through polysemic readings. a polysemic reading is where a media product has more than one meaning, therefor depending on how the audience interprets the reading they can lead to different views. For example back to the toddler murder in the BBC news the location Finsbury Park is used. This is a polysemic reading as many people may interpret this location differently, some may think this place is a middle class very nice place whereas some people may feel it is a working class, dirty place filled with crime. the headline for the BBC news is "Finsbury Park toddler death". This conveys the producers viewpoints and ideology that Finsbury park is a working class dirty place as the location is quickly followed by the world "death" which has negative connotations therefor presenting the producers ideology that Finsbury park is a negative place.

Another way newspapers can incorporate viewpoints an ideologies is through dominant ideology. This means that the newspaper presents a very strong belief and conveys how the producer feels. For example in The Daily Mirror the front page was about President Trump with the headline "what have they done.." with the image of the statue of liberty with her head in her hands surrounded by smoke. The mise-en-scene of the smoke behind the statue could be a intertextual reference to the 9/11 bombing suggesting that as another one could happen now trump has been elected. Also the lexis "they suggesting that we as Britain has nothing to do with it and americans have doomed their country themsleves. Therefore this use of dominant ideology conveys the producers viewpoint that trump is a bad president.

Student 4


Newspapers incorporate ideologies and viewpoints in many different ways including the lexis used and images chose to represent their stories.

Firstly, the lexis used by the newspaper is a big factor in how audiences view ideologies. For example, in a daily mirror newspaper about a 1 year old who was killed, the newspaper decided to use words such as toddler whereas other papers, such as the times, used words like young boy. This small difference creates a big impact on the audience as ‘toddler’ and ‘young boy’ create different reactions towards the suspected ‘murder’. For example, the daily mirror’s use of the word toddler makes the child seem more innocent and defenceless than young boy. This is one way the newspaper incorporated their ideology as they believed the murderer was an awful person and wanted the audience to think the same thing so they used more emotive language.

Another way newspapers can incorporate their own ideologies is through the images selected. Newspapers can create positive or negative viewpoints of people or events simply by the images used. For example, the daily mirror, when reporting on Donald trump winning the 2016 elections used an image of the statue of liberty with her hands covering her face in shame. This can create polysemic readings for the audience and overall creates a negative ideology of Donald trump. This is because the statue of liberty is a symbol of hope and the way she is covering her face suggests that there is no hope for America. Furthermore, there is a sense of intertextuality between the destruction in the background and disaster movies. This reinforces the ideology that Donald trump is bad for the world. This creates a link for the audience between Donald trump and destruction/disaster which links to George Gerbner’s theory of cultivation which suggests that if an audience is exposed to repeated patterns of representation, it will influence how they perceive that thing/person. Therefore, in adding this intertextuality, the newspaper is incorporating their ideology that Donald trump is dangerous and unfit to lead.

Thirdly, the positioning of certain headings/subheadings etc.. create different viewpoints for the audience. For example, the times’ newspaper also covering the 2016 presidential elections presented trump in a more positive way. A subheading on the front cover that read ‘THE NEW WORLD’ was positioned directly over Donald trump’s heart which has connotations of love, respect, power and unity. Just above the heading, Donald trump’s fist is in the air which represents power and patriotism. However, one possible negotiation for the audience could be that it represents dictatorship and possibly danger as it shows he is not afraid to use his power. This is one example of how newspapers can incorporate more than one ideology into the same thing. This is also shown through the image used and Donald trump’s unsure face. This creates the ideology that he is unprepared and possibly scared of his responsibility.

Student 5


In The Daily Mirror on the day of Trumps presidency, the ideology in that Trumps presidential position would be devastating is incorporated. One way in which The Daily Mirror have done this is through the choice of lexis "What have they done?". This headline presents a rhetorical question to the audience, creating an uncomfortable direct mode of address. This anchors the audience to believe viewpoints that the Americans have made a huge mistake and that the consequences should be fatal. The use of sans serif font in this headline acts as a hermeneutic connotation for the audience, that it is formal and blunt this suggests trump being president will lack informality, also a connotation of a tabloid newspaper. The mise-en-scene of the red text situated at the bottom suggests danger and destruction further insinuation that the mirror us biased against trump. Also in the mise-en-scene is a representation of terrorism, we can link this to Stuart Hall's theory of representation and the idea that in order to incorporate viewpoints and ideologies, newspapers such as The Daily Mirror use representation to convey their attitudes to the audience. The Daily Mirror presents this ideology of terrorism through the use of smoke and bombings in the background. This use of a polysemy or polysemic reading is a way in which newspapers/ producers create these viewpoints and ideologies. For example the mise-en-scene of the smoke connotes bombings and war. This infers to the audience that as a result of Trumps presidency ahh hell will break loose. Another way newspapers such as The Daily Mirror can convey these ideologies and viewpoints is through the use of intertextuality. The use of the Statue of Liberty, as seen in other media texts such as films and also other newspapers, is in a example of this. This intertextual reference creates a new way in which the audience can interpret the media language. A dominant ideology produced in this text is the ideology that trumps presidency will be explosive, for all of the wrong reasons. This is because the Mirrors use of the image of New York and the Statue of Liberty within the composition , connotes and gives reference to 9/11. As a result of this we can incorporate the viewpoints of The Mirror and construct the opinion that they are holding bias towards left wing politics, we know this due to their negative attitudes and the way in which they represent trump. Their agenda and use of only referring to Trumps surname is also assumptious towards its working class audience and presuming the fact that they know who Trump is and what has happened. They may be presumptuous of this because in The Daily Mirrors opinion this story is massive and life changing for many people.

However, The Times newspaper incorporate different viewpoints and ideologies. The dominant ideology being that Trump is great and that his presidency will bring only good things. One way newspapers can do this is through their choice of what is placed into the mise-en-scene of the images they select. For example Trump's red tie is connotative of hope, positivity, and patriotism. Red is also the colour of the republican party. Media language and lexis is also used to incorporate ideologies and viewpoints by The Times as it is by The Daily Mirror. The headline  'THE NEW WORLD is presented in sans-serif font which has connotations of positivity, seriousness, and the ideology that Trump will be a global force for good. Polysemic readings are also used by The Times like The Daily Mirror, for example lexis and choice of the word 'shockwaves' is perhaps symbolic of natural disasters. Potentially, the audience may negotiate a negative response to Trump which contrasts with other ideologies the audience can incorporate from the article. The composition and number of pages used to inform the audience of the information within the article by the producer is also a method used by newspapers. For example we know that Time Times think largely of Trump as their article takes us a two- page spread. This image chosen is flattering and the Media Language is positive and influential. The headline is placed at the top of the article. However in contrast to this The Daily Mirror think lesser of Trump as their article is spread over one single page. The article is also structured differently for example the image takes up most of the spread and is not even of Trump. Overall we can infer that The Times use a variety of methods to incorporate their ideologies and viewpoints for example they anchor ideologies that are more positive. One main ideology we can conceive is that ultimately, by generally supporting Trump, The Times has demonstrated a significant right wing bias. Further reinforces the ideological perspective of the newspaper. 

Student 6


Newspapers incorporate viewpoints and ideology in many different ways including in the Daily Mirrors front cover from Thursday the 10th of November 2016 when Donald Trump was elected at President of the United States. the Mise-en-scene of the front covers background of the dark coloured clouds and smokey sky which we have seen before as war ideology ,acts a s proairetic code which suggests that trump will bring war to the country this anchors the audience to believe that he will not do good for the country and will bring war to them. another example of Mise-en-scene from the newspaper front cover is the sans serif font lexis of "what have they done" this suggests that the world is disappointed with this decision and anchors the audience to feel this way too if they don't already.The mise-en -scene of the image of the statue of liberty covering her face, is important because the audience are aware of it and know that the statue is a  reference of liberty which means freedom, so the fact that the statue of liberty is covering her face in a disappointed way it could suggest that the producers viewpoint is that the countries freedom has been taken away from them.

The Times newspaper also wrote an article about the presidential election of Donald trump whereas the Daily mirrors front page article has a much more negative approach the Times is much more patriarchal and demonstrates a positive viewpoint of Trump in the sense that it includes the american flag in the background which suggests that the producers of this newspapers ideology about trump is that he will do well for them as a country. The mise- en-scene  of the headline in serif font of "the new world"has connotations of positivity, seriousness and ideology that trump will be a global force of good.also the producers have deliberately placed the the headline directly over Trumps heart which demonstrates his love and intentions to shape the world , the producers have done this to help connote a positive viewpoint of the new President. The back page lexis of the pull quote" you will be so proud of your president, you will be so proud" the lexis demonstrates the new presidents egotism , but may be comparative to other people such as martin luther king , however also intertextual reference to a comic book villain. Also because they colour being yellow in the repetition of "you will be so proud" have connotations of strength and vibrance.

The Daily Mirror incorporate positive viewpoints and ideologies where as the the Times producers have very different producers viewpoints and ideologies for example the lexis of the head line of  newspaper plays a huge part in telling the audience the viewpoints of the producers as in the Daily mirror  sans serif font is used which has connotations of being bold and dramatic which may be connoting that the producers feel this way about the election. but very differently in the Times serif font is used which has connotations of class and sophistication which not only could reflect the producers viewpoint but also the class of the people who the newspaper is aimed at.

Student 7


News papers can portray their ideological views in many different ways to get the ideas and believes across that they want their target audience to believe or negotiate with. It is beneficial that all newspapers incorporate their viewpoints and ideologies in subtle ways so to attract the right target audience, portray a message and create entertainment which all overall, make money for the newspaper industries.

Newspapers need to be different from each other so that they stand out. One of the main ways you can identify a newspapers ideology is by the language used and the image(s) selected firstly on the front cover; these all give indication as to what target audience the newspaper is trying to appeal to, and also what ideological perspective they are trying to manipulate into the main story. One clear example of opposing  ideologies on the same event is when Donald Trump won the Election in America and therefore became president. The Daily Mirror presented their viewpoint to be one of disappointment and worry for the future of not only the country, but the world.  Its obvious that the newspaper do not like Trump by the way they have presented their newspaper front cover: The main image chosen is very effective as it includes hidden connotations of war and explosions behind the statue of liberty which is (ironically) covering her face in fear, also giving indications of intertextuality because the background of the picture looks like a scene from an action/war movie - more specifically the planet of the apes- which references the ideology that Trump may cause the end of the world. the mise-en-scene of the statue of liberty covering her face shows that the Daily Mirror think Trump is untrustworthy; the statue of Liberty is symbolic for hope, freedom and liberty, a binary opposition is created by having her appear worried for the country. The slogan "what have they done?" shows a British perspective asking why Donald Trump was elected, however it also looks like the Statue of liberty is saying this whilst watching over the country. This Newspaper assumes that the target audience knows about politics and the American election as it's referring to him only by his second name,  it says "its president Trump..." which assumes that we know that he won and that elections were going on in America, the colour of the text is also red which gives the proairetic code of danger and violence, emphasising their viewpoint that Trump is untrustworthy and a bad mistake.  This newspaper is clearly targeted to a stereotypical, middle class audience who take interest in politics and disagree with the outcome of the election.

A second example of how news papers can shows ideological perspectives is The Times representation of the election. This newspaper is seen to be more positive as it features the american flag and states " the new world" over trumps heart giving it more positive connotations. the composition of the main image shows it is a special event as it is over a double page spread which isn't the usual form of a newspapers front cover- this will entice an audience to buy the newspaper and read it. The newspaper anchors us to focus on the fact Trump has won, the mise-en-scene of his fist in the air makes him victorious and strong, however this has polysemic views of slyness as it also portrays violence.

Student 8


Industry needs to promote its institution to attract more customers and in turn to appeal to their target audience, for instance the Daily Mirror and the Case Study of their newspaper with the headline “It’s President Trump” “What have they Done”. This headline is on top of the Main image of the statue of liberty weeping into its hands. This case study presents many ideological points portrayed by the producer. The Mise-en-scene of the weeping statue of liberty symbolizes that a great tragedy has forsaken all of America as the statue of liberty is commonly shown to represent America. There too is an instance of intertextuality with the weeping angels from Doctor Who a British TV show in which in one of the episodes the Statue of Liberty is shown covering its face weeping however behind its hands is a demonic and terrifying face, this shows that the Daily mirror is targeting this paper to a British audience and also anchoring to a more liberal point of view as Trump, the winner of the election is depicted to be the worst possible choice and that with him as president, America and in turn the world will be thrown into chaos. This article clearly depicts how newspapers can hold political biases and dominant ideologies doing so in order to please their target audience.

So as seen in the Daily mirror many factors can show a newspapers viewpoint and ideologies of specific events, another event that can be used to shown is how one news story is covered by different news corporations, showing the differences between their ideological biases. The story covered was that of a 1 year old boy found dead and how his father had been arrested due to suspicion of having attacked the young boy and the babies twin sister. The Times covers the story under the folio of News however it is page 7 news suggesting the times news doesn’t see this story to be very newsworthy, being that less people would be interested in reading it, and the way the article is compacted into the top of page seven not a full page such as shown by the daily mirror it enforces that the Times beliefs this article isn’t of much relevance to its target demographic. In this article the Times suggests in its headline “Man held after baby dies ‘in attack on twins’” that the baby was brutally murdered yet in the article itself there is no suggestion of such a thing, in fact there is no reason of death at all inside the article. Another article that covered the events was the Daily Mirror who dedicated an entire page to this story showing their ideological bias to the relevance of this story, Large bold headline used to make the story appeal to the audience, and an image of parents located to the side of the part of the article discussing mental health and this message of the parents being mentally ill is enforced by the body language of the parents in the image chosen looking rather sinister. Use of the name of the eye witness suggests authenticity of the article this quote however is not used in the article by the Times.

In these case studies show how articles can show their viewpoints and portray them to their audience, and how it can be done in many different ways. And as Stuart Halls theory of representation dictates different people will perceive the articles in their own opinion.

Student 9


Stuart Hall's theory of representation can be used to answer this by looking at how the producer's ideology can be decoded by the audience, the different readings from the audience; the oppositional reading with those who don't relate to the story and therefore may disagree with it, and then the negotiated reading in which the audience may relate to the media product however disagree with how it comes across to the audience. For example, The Times' front cover from a couple of years ago is polysemic, this is because it shows Trump looking proud and powerful with him holding his fist to the air, bringing connotations of freedom and strength; in which the audience may see the spread image biased towards Trump as well as the huge American flag behind the two figures suggesting patriotism and that he will have a large, positive impact on America. However the polysemy comes by how you interpret the front cover as the pull quote 'You will be so proud of your president, you will be so proud' which reinforces his ego as well as possibly making the reader feel uncomfortable due to the fact it feels as if it's being forced upon the audience. This links to how audiences can respond and interpret the ideological perspectives of the newspapers because it shows how they have multiple readings and that it's just how the audience sees the news stories, and how their personal views can affect how they interpret it.

Intertextuality is also important in helping the audience interpret the ideological perspectives of newspapers. Intertextuality is typically used in tabloid papers because of how it could be seen as informal, going against the whole tone of broadsheet papers. An example of intertextuality could be seen in the Daily Mirrors front cover of Trump's success with the elections, showing the statue of liberty weeping with a dark and gloomy setting, giving off connotations of a post-apocalyptic future; maybe implying Trump being in the White House will cause such tragic events such as 9/11 which can also be seen through the front cover with the smoke in the background, clearly a tragic world-known event. The use of sans-serif font has a hermeneutic connotation for the audience, with it being formal and blunt, further suggesting Trump will lack formallity. Hall's theory of reception can be used again here to see that the dominant reading from the front cover is clearly anti-Trump and that him being in power will lead to horrible futures; a negotiated reading of Trump being in power will not end well but not to the extent of the world coming to an end as we know it. The oppositional reading would be from people who favour Trump over his opposition which most likely isn't many people due to the fact the Daily Mirror is aimed at the working class in Britain, with not many people over here liking him as a person or a politician, again leading to it's all down to how the reader interprets the newspapers over their own personal views but for the majority of the time the newspaper's producer would have anchored their ideology within the news story through the headline, masthead, pull quote, etc.

Often newspapers use human interest stories to entertain the reader, stories that won't affect the audience in anyway but cause the reader to react in such way to entertain them. This is a common method of including multiple readings within a story, the majority of the time it uses your social and political backgrounds to determine how you feel about the news story. For example a right wing conservative may feel differently to a news story about a child gone missing in an area known for crime in comparison to someone in the working class who opposes their beliefs. Furthermore, the newspapers allow this to happen for one simple reason, profit. Allowing the audience to interpret the newspapers however they like could mean a wider audience

Student 10


In what ways can newspapers incorporate viewpoints and ideologies? An example of contrasting viewpoints showed in newspaper is the two different covers of two mainstream newspapers on Trumps inauguration day. The Daily Mirror used fictional mise en scene to create an almost apocalyptic idea of what was to come with trump has president.  The background smoke and weeping statue of liberty acted as a proairetic code foreshadowing what the ideologies of the daily mirror and what they believe is going to happen. On the other hand, the more right winged newspaper The Times had a more formal and optimistic cover. The mise en scene of the American flag was symbolic of the renowned American values: freedom, justice. This leads us to believe that the ideologies of the times is the they are anchoring the audience to think that Trump becoming president is a positive. Another way the newspapers are shown to be different is the font used, the times is using serif font which connotes to being formal and serious however the Daily Mirror uses a much more informal font, which highlights the idea that Trump is not someone who should be taken seriously despite his new role. A polysemic reading of the Times cover could be the  quote used from Trump “ You will be so proud of your president. You will be so proud.” This could be seen as a criticism of Trumps arrogance.    Furthermore, a very common ideology shown in many newspapers, tabloid especially, is the unrealistic and negative representation of women. An example of this is an article by the Daily Mirror in which multiple pictures of girls in very minimal clothing were plastered all over the website and the excuse for this was that they were looking at their bedroom floors. This article put the women in the picture in a very vulnerable position as hundreds of people used the comment section the voice their opinions. The comment section is another example of a way in which newspapers can incorporate different viewpoints as they have created a space where anyone can voice their own viewpoint. The theorist Liesbet Van Zoonen, discusses the theory of feminism, in which she believes that women’s bodies are used in media products as spectacle for heterosexual male audiences which reinforces patriarchal hegemony. Not only was the article previously discussed a prime example of this, but this idea is also found on the infamous ‘side bar of shame’ where daily pictures are posted of women’s bodies where men are able to discuss whether they think their bodies are acceptable or not. The ideologies shown through these articles are not only objectifying but also have an impact on the women reading the articles who start to think they need to live up to the standards created by the media, in this case newspapers such as the daily mirror, to be validated in society.