Wednesday 14 February 2024

Newspaper representation case study revision

For this post, we're going to look at two approaches to performing a representational comparative analysis on the set newspaper edition. Both groups chose the daily mirror, but please remember, The Times set edition could also come up for representation in component one section A! If none of this makes sense, get down to the past papers section and familiarise yourself with the exam!


You need to get very familiar with this front page!

Example one


2 - Compare how these pages from the Daily Mail and the Daily Mirror construct versions of reality. In your answer you must: 

consider the choices media producers make when constructing versions of reality 

consider the similarities and differences in the representations 

make judgements and draw conclusions about how far the representations relate to relevant media contexts. [30]


Examples of UK left wing newspapers 

The Daily Mirror/ The Mirror on Sunday (tabloid) 

The Guardian/ The Observer (broadsheets) 


Knee - jerk reaction - The Daily Mirror and the Daily Express are fundamentally different in terms of their political views


Plan

Rule of thirds

Camera shot types

Masthead

MES

Z pattern

Lexis

Layout

Font

Sans/serif

Tabloid

Broadsheet

Codes and conventions

David Gauntlett - identity

Stuart Hall

Stereotypes 

Ideology

Headings

Gender performativity

Bylines

Hegemony 


Introduction - DAC

Representation refers to how something is presented again, by the producer, for the purpose of constructing and reinforcing their own ideological perspective. By presenting something again, a producer can construct a new version of reality, and, in turn, can manipulate the ideology of the target audience for the purpose of power and profit. In order to explore this idea, I shall look at these two newspapers, in particular, the front page of the daily mirror, a left wing UK tabloid, and the daily express, a right wing UK tabloid

Paragraph one: main headline and lexis

The MES of the colour yellow for the lexis ZERO SHAME has symbolic connotations of a stern warning, and suggests to the target audience (working class and left wing) that Johnson is a threat. 

Paragraph two: the main images 

The front page of the daily mirror uses a striking main image of Boris Johnson in order to construct a highly leading version of reality. The producer has selected a mid shot of Johnson, which emphasises the MES of his smug expression. This version of reality is further anchored through the MES of his un-brushed hair, which symbolises Johnson’s incompetence, and reinforces the preferred reading that Johnson is an unreliable PM. The image compliments the text through the layout and position, with the lexis of the headline NO SHAME further anchoring the ideological perspective that Johnson is a bad character. Hall argues that representations are constructed through a series of stereotypes. Stereotypes have the function of manipulating the ideology of the audience, and provide an excellent short cut for the producer to present their own ideology and specific version of reality. 

Paragraph three: Composition and layout


Example two


1. Compare the ideologies conveyed through the representations in front page of the times and the edition of the Mirror you have studied with Boris Johnson on the front page..
In your answer, you must:
consider how representations convey ideologies
consider the similarities and differences in the ideologies conveyed
make judgements and draw conclusions about how far social and cultural contexts affect the representations. [30]

Knee jerk reaction - the newspapers present completely contrasting representations, that also depict contrasting ideologies 


High key lighting
Codes and conventions
Masthead
Lisbet Van Zoonen - feminist theory
Hard news
Soft news
Gauntlett identity - identity
Stuart Hall representation
Stereotypes
MES
Lexis 
Text font
Gender performativity 
Semiotics 
Hegemony
Patriarchal hegemony
Encoding and decoding 
Columns
Gutters
Main image
Front page
Copy 
Journalists
Byline
Skyline
Cost
Barcode
Propaganda
Audience manipulation
Working class
Tabloid
Tories

Introduction - DAC


Representation refers to the ways in which a producer represents a person, issue or event using media language to encode their own ideologies. Therefore representations can be used to persuade an audience to believe the dominant ideology of the producer. In this this essay, I shall argue that two completely different and contrasting ideologies are constructed through these newspapers. To explore this idea, I shall use the examples of The Daily Mirror, a working class, left leaning tabloid newspaper published by Reach PLC, and The Daily Telegraph, a right wing broadsheet newspaper targeting a more middle class audience with a higher level of education. 

Paragraph - main image


MES of messy hair constructs an ideology of Johnson as a slacker, who is not taking his highly important job seriously. This representation is further anchored his smug, tired facial expression, which constructs a representation of an irresponsible middle aged man. The MES of Jojhnsons’s slouched shoulders, further reinforce this representation. Constructed through a mid shot, Johnson presents a powerful representation to the target audience, who are positioned to accept the preferred reading that Johnson does not feel guilty for his enormous incompetence. Furthermore, the enormous size of Johnson on the front page not only symbolically represents his power, but also his complete lack of responsibility. Stuart Hall argues that stereotypes are used by powerful people, in this case Mirror Journalists, in order to simplify complex political ideologies. The working class target audience of the mirror will identify with this simple and straightforward representation, and therefore agree with the political ideology of the newspaper. This ensures that audiences will continue to read the newspaper, and will continue to identify with the dominant ideological position.

However, The Daily Telegraph presents a radically different ideological perspective of the Tory Party through the selection of the main image

Paragraph 2 - lexis, headlines, captions


Paragraph 3 - non-headline stories and soft news 


Monday 12 February 2024

The Battle of Algiers - encoding conflict

Unless it is a very bad film, ideological perspectives do not simply 'happen'. It is rare a commentator will appear on screen and explain exactly what the ideological perspective of the director is (unless it's a Hitchcock film...). However, expertly applied film language can encode an ideological perspective in a clear and insightful manner.

In this session, you will be analyzing a key scene from Battle of Algiers.

1 - Task one: watch 'the bombing of the Casbah and the aftermath' 


You can find the film by clicking here. Watch from 37m 42s to 42m 55s

2 - Analysis 


Just as a reminder, the five micro elements, or elements of film language are

  • Sound, including diegesis
  • Editing, including pace
  • Mise en scene
  • Performance, including proxemics, address etc.
  • Cinematography, including lighting, blocking, framing, shot types, camera angles

In the hands of a skilled director, they combine to create meaning


Using these elements of film language, analyze the following screenshots from the sequence outlined.  If you get stuck, the following questions will help you:

  • How does framing align the audience to the values of the director? 
  • How is a sense of conflict constructed through MES and editing?
  • How is a heroic ideological perspective encoded through cinematography?
  • How does the MES make the film resemble a newsreel? And what ideological perspective does this heighten?
  • How does the stark binary between light and dark constructed through lighting present an ideological perspective?
  • How is the spectator positioned through the combination of editing and sound?
  • How does the naturalistic performance of the Algerian actors heighten spectatorial emotional involvement?









Fandom and Assassin's Creed

Previously we have considered the (largely fallacious) idea that videogames have a 'direct' affect on their audience. We have furthered this idea by thinking about Stuart Hall's reception theory, and how different audiences will of course react in completely different ways. However, there are still two more theories that we can apply to help us understand how audiences react to videogames.


Active models of audience: Henry Jenkins and Clay Shirky


Task one - defining theory

We've looked at these two guys before! But, using your own notes, an internet resource, the theories and theorist post, and/or the theories and theorist video, write down a short, sharp definition of both of these theorists (Jenkins and Shirky)


Task two - examples of fandom: active audience engagement

This next bit is simple!

Jenkins often referred to the active process of audience participation as 'textual poaching'. Basically audiences can 'poach' or steal exactly what they want from a media product, and the most active fans will then take their favorite bits and create their own fan works, which can include fan films, fan fiction, fan art, cosplay and so on. For Clay Shirky, this whole process proves that the audience are now basically producers in their own right, which is something that videogame producers are increasingly relying on! 

For the following examples of fandom, click the following links, check out the fan material, try not to cringe, and make notes under the following bullet points

  1. How does this fan product allow fans the opportunity to explore their favorite franchise?
  2. How does Ubisoft benefit from fans creating this product?
  3. Why on earth would a fan make this, beyond just liking the franchise?
  4. What opportunities does this product give fans the opportunity to interact with other fans?
  5. How does this product meet the needs of the audience of Assassin's Creed?

Assassin's Kittens


 (Assassin's Creed Live Action Fan Film)






Wednesday 7 February 2024

Videogame industry: self-directed lesson

This lesson covers a number of topics and potential exam questions. None of it is very hard, but please rememebr that absolutely any of this could come up, both in the final mock and the final exam!




1 - How does Assassin's Creed: Mirage intentionally minimise risk and maximise profit?


Ubisoft have made approximately 27 Asassin's Creed games in less than 20 years. This is clearly a signficant amount of games, and has led to financial issues for the company, as their output has stagnated, and recent titles have 'not mety sales expectations'. To combat this, Ubsisoft have released another Assassin's Creed game.

Task - watch this trailer and answe the efollowing questions


  • What does this game do differently to other assassin's creed games like unity and valhalla?
  • How will this game minimise risk and maximise profit?
  • How will this game appeal to 'core' assassinm's creed fans?

check out slides 95 - 98 on the videogames 1 ppt for suggestions!

2 - How does Assassin's Creed: Mirage cause harm and offense?


Watch this example of gameplay from Mirage. You can skip a few minutes to the good bits. As you are watching this actual game footage, make notes of anything offesnsive or harmful. It helps if you pretend to be VERY offended...

3 - How are videogames regulated?



EXTENTION - What effect do videogames have on their audiences?