Applying postmodern theory to Humans

Jean Baudrillard – theories surrounding postmodernism

Odi is a hyperreal construct. To George, he is far more real than anything else in his life. But is this in spite of, or because of how irreparably broken he is? Does Odi and George's intense and subversive relationship reflect a breakdown in societal values? Why does George love Odi so much? What is real, and does it matter?

This 'theory' is extremely difficult to define, as it's an 'anti-theory' theory. So things are going to get very complicated very quickly. Luckily, postmodernism as a critical approach is often applied in a loose way, so don't worry too much about how you apply it in your written work. 

Concept one – it is impossible to objectively define what is real. Therefore, there is no such thing as reality

Concept two – we live in an age where there is more and more information, and less and less meaning

Concept three – Since all forms of meaning have collapsed, media products reflect ideologies and messages that have never even existed in the first place

Hyperreality

Hyperreality - where the representation is more real that the thing that is represented 

Baudrillard argued that we are increasingly unable to differentiate between what is real and what is not, but this does not matter, as there is no quantifiable, objective reality

Examples of hyperreality 

• Instagram accounts of famous models, for example Kylie Jenner and Bella Hadid generally feature highly editing, 'perfect' reconstructions of reality, that are far more interesting than how they actually live their lives. Audiences are absolutely aware that Jenner is a hyperreal construct, and is 'fake' or not real... but we don't care! This is because the world is so complicated that we have absolutely no idea what is actually going on anymore, and it is preferable to simply accept the surface value of representations. The fake is BETTER than reality.
• News headlines and reportage of big stories, often reduce difficult situations to more easily digestible examples
• Advertisements: chocolate bars, for example Lindt chocolate sell an exciting sexual lifestyle that goes beyond the simple act of eating chocolate 
• Makeup, clothing, brands, products, all promise to transform us in to something completely different 

What examples of hyperreality are evident in the breakfast scene?

Sophie - "is this a party?"
Joe - "No Soph, this is what breakfast is supposed to be like!"

But what is breakfast 'supposed' to look like? For one thing, the whole family are eating together 

The family are surrounded by a number of different options, including the MES of teapots, a range of cutlery, toast in a toast rack, and little pots of jam and milk. It resembles a breakfast at a hotel rather than a 'real' breakfast at home. When Joe says 'this is what breakfast is supposed to be like', he is making reference to breakfast scenes on TV and in adverts.

The Hawkins family themselves are a stereotypical ,hyperreal and traditional white middle class family. They resemble other stereotypical white middle class groups, such as in Friends, Home Alone, Modern Family, My Family, Outnumbered, and many more examples. They fulfil every hegemonic norm and expectation. Even if you are from a white, middle class, nuclear family, it is frankly very unlikely you live in a similar manner to the Hawkins family. Yet, despite not resembling the vast majority of even white middle class families, they still seem more real through their familiarity. The audience not only suspend their disbelief, but simply accept this contradiction. 

Anita as a hyperreal construct

Anita herself is a hyperreal representation. She is absolutely perfect. What makes her perfect?

• Symmetrical facial features
• Well spoken 
• She is very tall
• Her movements are soft and graceful
• She is emotionless
• She laughs when she is told to 
• She is controllable
• She does what you tell her
• She is subservient 
• She is submissive
• She is conservative
• She doesn't need to eat or drink

But these ideas of 'perfection' are highly problematic! Anita resembles a hyperreal hegemonic approximation not of a real woman, but of a simulacrum of a 1950s British housewife 

The collapse of meaning

Baudrillard argued that we live in a world with more and more information and less and less meaning. This is a concept that has become more apparent since his death. 

The news cycle is engineered to be highly stressful and extremely confusing, with a number of highly contradictory stories. On any given day, themes of nuclear annihilation, economic collapse, and political manipulation are combined with stories about football, celebrity gameshows, and how thin Bela Hadid is. This extremely confusing mode of address instigate feeling of depression, misery, anxiety, resignation and confusion. The news cycle could be argued to be a form of social control. By presenting such a confusing, misleading and highly inflammatory set of contradictory narratives, audiences are simply so confused that they slip in to other media products, and escape in to less stressful situations. The world in which we live in has been structured in such a way that it is impossible to understand. 

The main news headlines from The Mail Online, 16th November 2022. A highly confusing and contradictory mess of information is presented to the audience

How are themes of confusion, anxiety and paranoia encoded in Humans?

• Laura is anxious and paranoid about being replaced as both a mother and a Lover, by Anita, a perfect, fake human. This could symbolise the collapse of the metanarrative of marriage, and traditional values that generally state we should remain with one partner
• Matty has completely lost all motivation, as traditional metanarratives of work and employment have been replaced. Increasingly, even highly skilled jobs can be carried out by robots and artificial intelligence. Traditional jobs, such as security guards, flight attendants, mail people, factory workers, media studies teachers, artists replaced with artificial intelligence
• Many of the human characters have found it hard to adjust to robots just existing. Laura refuses to get one, and inspector Drummond is highly critical of his wife's rehabilitation synth. 
• Laura gets very defensive: it's just a robot, she isn't your friend. "you're just a stupid machine, aren't you?" Constructs a 'them and us' situation
• George is highly critical of the police and the government for interfering with his private life with Odi. The MES of George's DON'T RING/NO VISITORS sign indicates his preference for isolation
• Leo has had his friends and lovers stolen from him, and he is desperately trying to get them back
• Leo is going through a significant identity crisis. He is not human. Or is he? He is half robot, and has essentially been bought back to life through technology. In many ways he should not exist, which adds to the confusing nature of the show
• The use of low key lighting throughout the show encodes a sense of paranoia
• Laura has a significant fear of being replaced by Anita. She is terrified of her role as a mother being replaced by Anita. Previously, she cleaned the house, read stories and cooked for her children. All these aspects have now been taken away from her.
• Themes of the singularity. Matty is absolutely dejected by the idea of the singularity. She has completely given up, because artificial intelligence will take any job that she applies for. Her future is completely uncertain, and frankly pointless

Key scene - breakfast

• While the breakfast scene may seem on the surface to be nothing but comic relief, the escapist hyperreal fantasy it offers presents deeply rooted themes of anxiety, distrust and depression, which are fundamental to the postmodern condition.
• The mid-shot reaction shot of Anita's laughing at Joe's performatively terrible joke anchors and emphasises the creepy and robotic nature of this laugh. This laugh has been digitally looped in post production to further emphasises her robotic nature, and the simple fact that she does not exist. This is further anchored through a montage of mid-shots of the increasingly confused reactions of the Hawkins family, followed by absolute silence, which constructs an awkward and uncomfortable binary opposition.
• Laura is clearly highly irritated by Anita's presence, at one stage shouting "for God's sake, that's already clean, just sit down'. This exasperated outburst is further anchored through the gesture of her hand being held up to her face in resignation 
• Joe's attempt at a joke is clearly an attempt to distract from a toxic situation 
• After referring to Anita as a 'dishwasher', Matty admonishes Toby with the line "because we can't guess why you like her so much , crusty sheets'. Matty realises and is disgusted by Toby's sexual desire for Anita, and by bringing up his masturbation in front of his family, is desperately trying to upset toby. This is symbolic of a collapse of the traditional nuclear family, and deliberately breaches sexual taboos 
  
  

Key scene - the brothel

• The montage of Leo walking down the narrow of the brothel draws attention to the MES of the building itself. The tight corridors function as a hermeneutic code, constructing a powerful sense of mystery and confusion for the target audience
• The gesture of Niska slapping Leo in the face is anchored through the use of a close-up reaction shot of Leo's confused face. This highly contradictory binary opposition further reinforces the themes of anxiety and confusions
• There is a huge contradiction formed between Leo walking in to the brothel, and Leo leaving Niska's room. Walking in to the brothel, Leo is constructed as a stereotypical, patriarchally dominant man. His sharp, dominant delivery of the line "keep walking" reinforces his dominant status as a hegemonically powerful man. However, this quickly unravels as he enter the brothel. A close up of his face as he rings the doorbell symbolises his nervousness, which stands in stark contrast to his earlier confidence. Through the use of POV shots, we as an audience are suddenly positioned as Leo himself. A close up reaction of his facial expression reveals a complicated polysemic mixture of disgust, confusion, paranoia and anxiety. This highly confusing and highly contradictory collection of emotions informs the audience that the world in which we live in is so completely complicated and contradictory that we have no hope of understanding
• The brothel itself is a hyperreal construction of a locations that audiences will be both highly familiar with, yet have no direct experience of. The MES of pink lighting, coupled with the uncomfortable MES of hegemonically attractive women dancing seductively behind glass makes intertextual reference to crime dramas. This contradictory and confusing mode of address positions the audience in a confusing way. 
• MES captured of panning shot of the already established brothel encodes women as a mere commodity, a highly dehumanising, anxiety inducing and emotionally distancing technique. It symbolises that prostitution is accepted or at least tolerated in a postmodern society, which forms a proairetic code, encoding the potential anxiety of the audience as they consider the outcome of sexualising women, which supports the postmodern theory that previously held metanarratives have been destroyed, and the audience must accept a confusing new world.
• "I was meant to feel pain". Niska defines her humanity through her ability to feel pain, and chooses to feel the pain of sexual exploitation even though she technically doesn't have to. This draws attention to uncomfortable and challenging themes surrounding sexualisation and objectification. 
• The character of Niska herself is particularly confusing. She is a cyborg. but she believes/knows that she is a human. She is also a prostitute, as encoded through the MES of her lingerie, and she is a friend, a murderer...

These elements underline and reinforce a powerful critique of the postmodern condition 

Distrust of metanarratives

Metanarrative: a way of understanding the world

• Examples of metanarratives include marriage, the nuclear family, traditional career paths, traditional gender roles, traditional sexuality, religion
• Postmodern theory not only disagree with these, but simply presents that they do not exist anymore. They never even existed in the first place...

Further examples of metanarratives include...

• Parenthood, with clearly defined gender boundaries as to what parents should do
• Sexuality - heteronormativity. Being heterosexual is 'normal', and being gay is tolerated, but generally seen as different, or 'abnormal'
• Capitalism! Getting money is important! You can buy stuff with it! Success in life can clearly be defined through earnings 
• Religion. Live a good life and receive an eternal reward

Simulacra and Simulation

This is the title of perhaps Baudrillard's most famous essay, which was published in a book of the same title. 

A Baudrillardian simulacra is a representation of something that never existed in the first place. It is a representation of a representation of a representation. An excellent example is Anita, who appears as a combination of a stereotypical 1950s housewife, a maid/butler and prostitute. Yet Anita is none of these things. She is not even Anita.

A simulation is a virtual world. Since we have ascertained that nothing is real, we all live in a simulation. Yep. Sorry. This isn’t real.

Negative criticisms of postmodernism 

• Theory is highly inconsistent, and has no sense of continuity
• Theory has no structure, and is completely unsubstantiated
• Self-destructive. How can a theory be 'anti-theory'?
• Postmodernism is arguably a metanarrative. It is a way of thinking about the world. However, it also argues that metanarrative do not exist. This is highly contradictory
• There is no objective accuracy, and we can never make definitive conclusions
• It's extremely confusing and difficult (impossible!) to understand 
• It is not a sustainable way to think about the world. Without some form of positivity, everything will collapse and no one will ever do anything
• Highly destructive, nihilistic, damaging to society
• It is a black hole of theory, it goes nowhere, and it contradicts
• It is extremely unpopular in academic circles 
• It's simply a cool and edgy theory, nothing more
• Postmodernism is yet another passive media theory. It argues that life sucks and we have no power
• Highly deterministic, absolutely lacking in nuance, it doesn't consider individual aspects